2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2010.11.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

4D active time constrained resistivity inversion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
59
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As outlined at the end of the previous section, this statement holds today, although some of the above controls have been further investigated in laboratory studies over the past 15 years, including mainly textural parameters (e.g., Vanhala 1997; Slater and Lesmes 2002; Scott and Barker 2003; Binley et al 2005; Slater et al 2006; Kruschwitz et al 2010; Weller et al 2010a) and permeability (e.g., Börner et al 1996; Slater and Lesmes 2002; Binley et al 2005; Revil and Florsch 2010; Zisser et al 2010a; Koch et al 2011; Revil et al 2012b). More laboratory measurements are particularly needed regarding the effect of chemistry (e.g., Lesmes and Frye 2001; Vaudelet et al 2011; Weller et al 2011), saturation (e.g., Ulrich and Slater 2004; Jougnot et al 2010; Breede et al 2012), temperature (e.g., Binley et al 2010; Zisser et al 2010b; Martinez et al 2012), multiple fluid phases (e.g., Cassiani et al 2009; Schmutz et al 2010; Revil et al 2011) and in addition effective pressure (e.g., Zisser and Nover 2009), grain‐size distribution (e.g., Revil and Florsch 2010), pH (e.g., Skold et al 2011) and the effect of microbial processes (see Atekwana and Slater 2009 for a recent review). Biogeophysics research has determined that SIP is one of the most promising geophysical techniques for detecting the alteration of mineral‐fluid interfaces and pore geometries resulting from microbial growth and biofilm formation (e.g., Abdel Aal et al 2004; Ntarlagiannis et al 2005a; Davis et al 2006; Abdel Aal et al 2009, 2010a,b) as well as biomineralization (e.g., Ntarlagiannis et al 2005b; Williams et al.…”
Section: Laboratory Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As outlined at the end of the previous section, this statement holds today, although some of the above controls have been further investigated in laboratory studies over the past 15 years, including mainly textural parameters (e.g., Vanhala 1997; Slater and Lesmes 2002; Scott and Barker 2003; Binley et al 2005; Slater et al 2006; Kruschwitz et al 2010; Weller et al 2010a) and permeability (e.g., Börner et al 1996; Slater and Lesmes 2002; Binley et al 2005; Revil and Florsch 2010; Zisser et al 2010a; Koch et al 2011; Revil et al 2012b). More laboratory measurements are particularly needed regarding the effect of chemistry (e.g., Lesmes and Frye 2001; Vaudelet et al 2011; Weller et al 2011), saturation (e.g., Ulrich and Slater 2004; Jougnot et al 2010; Breede et al 2012), temperature (e.g., Binley et al 2010; Zisser et al 2010b; Martinez et al 2012), multiple fluid phases (e.g., Cassiani et al 2009; Schmutz et al 2010; Revil et al 2011) and in addition effective pressure (e.g., Zisser and Nover 2009), grain‐size distribution (e.g., Revil and Florsch 2010), pH (e.g., Skold et al 2011) and the effect of microbial processes (see Atekwana and Slater 2009 for a recent review). Biogeophysics research has determined that SIP is one of the most promising geophysical techniques for detecting the alteration of mineral‐fluid interfaces and pore geometries resulting from microbial growth and biofilm formation (e.g., Abdel Aal et al 2004; Ntarlagiannis et al 2005a; Davis et al 2006; Abdel Aal et al 2009, 2010a,b) as well as biomineralization (e.g., Ntarlagiannis et al 2005b; Williams et al.…”
Section: Laboratory Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned, ERT surveys were simulated at intervals corresponding to ∼10% reductions of the DNAPL mass. Although difference or 4D inversion routines (e.g., Kim et al, 2009;Karaoulis et al, 2011a) may best take advantage of the differences detected, such optimization of the ERT analysis for DNAPL remediation is the subject of future work. Figure 7a and 7c reveals that, as expected, the DNAPL mass was removed from the source zone in a heterogeneous manner (compare to Figure 6c).…”
Section: Mapping Dnapl Remediationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, this envelope of favorable conditions is likely dependent on the ERT survey design and processing methodology, neither of which have been optimized for DNAPL sites. It is possible that recent advances in ERT imaging (e.g., data acquisition and timelapse monitoring) may be beneficial in this context (e.g., Ogilvy et al, 2009;Karaoulis et al, 2011a;Nenna et al, 2011). The systematic, controlled studies required to explore these questions at the field scale are not available from field trials or laboratory studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The different inversion scheme takes advantage of the repetition of measurements over time to eliminate the systematic error component of the data (LaBrecque and Yang, 2001;Kemna et al, 2002). The 4D inversion scheme (Kim et al, 2009;Karaoulis et al, 2011) inverts multiple data sets simultaneously including the time dimension in the inversion process. However, deterministic time-lapse inversion schemes still remain dependent on the spatial or spatiotemporal regularization procedure required to overcome the ill-posedness of the ERT inverse problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%