2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.10.493
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

474: Active versus expectant management in preterm premature rupture of membranes at 34 weeks: a decision analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study respiratory distress syndrome was seen in 6% in induction group and that of 8% in expectant group, neonatal sepsis was of 4% and 6% in induction versus expectant group. Study by E. Baras, M. Rodriguez et al (16) showed respiratory distress syndrome 6.84% versus 3.7%, neonatal sepsis 6.4% versus 3.86% in induction versus expectant group. T. Biswas, S.K.…”
Section: Table 3: Duration Of Rupture Of Membrane (Based On Chisquarementioning
confidence: 93%
“…In our study respiratory distress syndrome was seen in 6% in induction group and that of 8% in expectant group, neonatal sepsis was of 4% and 6% in induction versus expectant group. Study by E. Baras, M. Rodriguez et al (16) showed respiratory distress syndrome 6.84% versus 3.7%, neonatal sepsis 6.4% versus 3.86% in induction versus expectant group. T. Biswas, S.K.…”
Section: Table 3: Duration Of Rupture Of Membrane (Based On Chisquarementioning
confidence: 93%