2007
DOI: 10.1016/s1569-9056(07)60469-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

471 Update on Chronic Pudendal Nerve Stimulation in Sacral Area Dysfunctions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Preliminary studies of PNS have predominantly investigated patients with neurogenic and non‐neurogenic causes of urge urinary incontinence, with outcome comparable to that seen with SNS [65–68]. Patients with constipation [66] and faecal incontinence [66,69] and those with bowel dysfunction secondary to spinal cord injury [70] may also benefit from treatment. A prospective, single blinded, randomised cross‐over trial comparing PNS with SNS in thirty subjects with urinary voiding disorders demonstrated that the symptom relief obtained by PNS was greater than that obtained by SNS in 80% of patients [71].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preliminary studies of PNS have predominantly investigated patients with neurogenic and non‐neurogenic causes of urge urinary incontinence, with outcome comparable to that seen with SNS [65–68]. Patients with constipation [66] and faecal incontinence [66,69] and those with bowel dysfunction secondary to spinal cord injury [70] may also benefit from treatment. A prospective, single blinded, randomised cross‐over trial comparing PNS with SNS in thirty subjects with urinary voiding disorders demonstrated that the symptom relief obtained by PNS was greater than that obtained by SNS in 80% of patients [71].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%