2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.08.566
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

455P A meta-analysis of efficacy and safety of cetuximab with biweekly vs. weekly dosing

Abstract: after 4 months 80.4AE17.3. Also, fatigue, appetite loss, and nausea/vomiting did not deteriorate over time. Final QoL results will be presented at the ESMO Congress.Conclusions: Overall survival in almost 500 patients from start of FTD/TPI is comparable to other population-based studies. Our results suggest that fewer symptoms at start of FTD/TPI treatment are associated with longer treatment duration. QoL was maintained during FTD/TPI treatment, which supports its use in clinical practice.Legal entity respons… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, a meta-analysis by Parikh et.al. reported similar efficacy and safety of biweekly versus weekly schedule and noted that biweekly dosing may potentially reduce the A c c e p t e d M a n u s c r i p t burden and cost of administration [19]. Also, patients with mCRC receiving biweekly cetuximab achieved similar overall survival (OS) to those administered weekly cetuximab [16,20,21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, a meta-analysis by Parikh et.al. reported similar efficacy and safety of biweekly versus weekly schedule and noted that biweekly dosing may potentially reduce the A c c e p t e d M a n u s c r i p t burden and cost of administration [19]. Also, patients with mCRC receiving biweekly cetuximab achieved similar overall survival (OS) to those administered weekly cetuximab [16,20,21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%