The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
AIHce 1999 1999
DOI: 10.3320/1.2763314
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

445. Estimating Historical Respirable Crystalline Silica Exposures for Chinese Pottery Workers and Iron/Copper, Tin, and Tungsten Miners

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whereas in the United States impinger measurements with counting of single particles (''mppcf''), where the base of the recalculation process, in Australia konimeter data and later gravimetric sampling (''total dust'' and respirable dust) were used. In the Chinese cohorts, a local instrument for the gravimetric determination of total dust was applied (Zhuang et al 2001;Dahmann et al 2004), however, the highest exposure concentration used in the respective job-exposure matrices was set to 25 mg/m 3 of total dust (Zhuang et al 2001). This seems to clearly indicate an underestimation of exposures, at least during the times when dry drilling, was applied.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas in the United States impinger measurements with counting of single particles (''mppcf''), where the base of the recalculation process, in Australia konimeter data and later gravimetric sampling (''total dust'' and respirable dust) were used. In the Chinese cohorts, a local instrument for the gravimetric determination of total dust was applied (Zhuang et al 2001;Dahmann et al 2004), however, the highest exposure concentration used in the respective job-exposure matrices was set to 25 mg/m 3 of total dust (Zhuang et al 2001). This seems to clearly indicate an underestimation of exposures, at least during the times when dry drilling, was applied.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, setting scientifically based limit values is complicated, owing to the difficulties in interpreting heterogeneous experimental and epidemiological findings (Chen et al 2001a;OEHHA 2005;Zhuang et al 2001). Despite much recent progress in our understanding of source attribution, emission factors, and regulation of silica (Chen et al 2012;Rong et al 2013;Sellamuthu et al 2013), current risk assessment models based on parameterization of laboratory experiments cannot fully explain the magnitude of silica-induced pulmonary disease risk.…”
Section: Responsible Editor: Marcus Schulzmentioning
confidence: 97%