Mental Tests and Cultural Adaptation 1972
DOI: 10.1515/9783111556482-046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

43. The factor structure of intelligence among teachers in the Congo

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…He found that the scores on a revised version of the SPM showed an unrotated loading of .57 on the first factor, as well as a sizeable cross-loading of .34 on a second factor he interpreted in terms of physical factors and manual dexterity. Claeys (1972) factor analyzed data from 101 firstgrade teachers from Kinshasa, who completed a battery of 24 tests including the SPM, and found that the commonality of the SPM was rather low (i.e., .38).…”
Section: Factor Analytical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He found that the scores on a revised version of the SPM showed an unrotated loading of .57 on the first factor, as well as a sizeable cross-loading of .34 on a second factor he interpreted in terms of physical factors and manual dexterity. Claeys (1972) factor analyzed data from 101 firstgrade teachers from Kinshasa, who completed a battery of 24 tests including the SPM, and found that the commonality of the SPM was rather low (i.e., .38).…”
Section: Factor Analytical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The similarities of the two higher-order factors are quite high for both grade levels. Claeys (1972) administered 24 tests to 101 Congolese first grade teachers. Although no comparison sample of non-Ugandans was available, the results are highly similar to those found in American studies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Booth (2002, p. 378) stated “If there are universals, they must be discovered,” and for the reasons mentioned above, we think it is plausible that g may be a universal property of cognitive data in humans—whether or not a cultural group describes “intelligence” in a way similar to Western definitions. While there have been scattered reports of g in nations throughout the world (e.g., Church & Katigbak, 1987; Claeys, 1972; Guthrie, 1963; Miron, 1975; Proctor, Kranzler, Rosenbloom, Martinez, & Guevara-Aguire, 2000; Rothhammer & Llop, 1976; Vernon, 1961, 1965b), in this study we aim to systematically compile as many data sets as possible from non-Western populations in developing nations and determine whether each one produces a general cognitive ability factor using a uniform factor analysis methodology. In this way we hope to put g theory to a strongly falsifiable empirical test and to test whether g theory has limits in its applicability across human cultures.…”
Section: Purpose Of Studymentioning
confidence: 99%