2000
DOI: 10.1023/a:1004072310525
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The aforementioned mixing models are based on assumptions that d 13 C values of plant canopy, SOM, root, and litter may approximate those of each component of E c and E s . The assumptions lie in the fact that: (1) there is no C isotopic fractionation during heterotrophic microbial respiration (Lin and Ehleringer 1997); (2) there is little C isotopic fractionation during the early decomposing stage of fallen plant substances (Balesdent et al 1993;Dehairs et al 2000). Based on published litter turnover times, we limited the study period to 2-3 months such that only the first litterfall contributes to E l , and afterwards there was little new litter formation and decay in the chamber; and (3) there was a negligible difference between d 13 C values of sediment organic C in the surface layer and that of sediment released CO 2 , and little difference of d 13 C values among different soil size fractions as suggested by Bird et al (1996).…”
Section: Sample Collection and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aforementioned mixing models are based on assumptions that d 13 C values of plant canopy, SOM, root, and litter may approximate those of each component of E c and E s . The assumptions lie in the fact that: (1) there is no C isotopic fractionation during heterotrophic microbial respiration (Lin and Ehleringer 1997); (2) there is little C isotopic fractionation during the early decomposing stage of fallen plant substances (Balesdent et al 1993;Dehairs et al 2000). Based on published litter turnover times, we limited the study period to 2-3 months such that only the first litterfall contributes to E l , and afterwards there was little new litter formation and decay in the chamber; and (3) there was a negligible difference between d 13 C values of sediment organic C in the surface layer and that of sediment released CO 2 , and little difference of d 13 C values among different soil size fractions as suggested by Bird et al (1996).…”
Section: Sample Collection and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wide range for δ CPOC (rivers ~ -25 to -28‰; marine plankton ~ -18 to -22‰; C3 plant ~ -23 to -34‰; C4 plants ~ -9 to -17‰) have been reported by several researchers in different environments (Hedges et al, 1997, Bouillon et al, 2002, Zhang et al, 1997, Smith and Epstein, 1971, Dehairs et al, 2000. On an average, δ 13 CPOC at the Hooghly (-24.87 ± 0.89‰) was relatively lower compared to that of Sundarbans (-23.36 ± 0.32‰) suggesting relatively higher influence of terrestrial inputs in the Hooghly.…”
Section: Particulate Organic Matter In the Hooghly -Sundarbans Systemmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Relatively depleted δ 13 C and δ 15 N of phytoplankton in the frontal regions (À25.1 ± 0.5‰ and 4.2 ± 0.3‰, respectively) than the typical δ 13 C and δ 15 N of marine phytoplankton (À23 to À21‰ and 5-7‰, respectively) (Altabet, 1996;Brandes & Devol, 2002;Dehairs et al, 2000;Lamb et al, 2006) suggest that the primary production within the frontal zones is supported by the upwelling of subsurface nutrients. This is because the mineralization of organic matter by heterotrophic activity in the water column releases 13 C-depleted DIC and 15 N-depleted dissolved inorganic nitrogen (DIN) due to the preferential release of 12 C and 14 N, respectively.…”
Section: Potential Sources Of Poc In the Frontal Regionmentioning
confidence: 99%