4289Clinical outcomes of percutaneous mitral valve repair in secondary mitral regurgitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

Background The benefit of percutaneous mitral valve repair with mitraclip (PMVR) in patients with secondary mitral regurgitation (MR) is still debated. Methods In order to compare the outcome of PMVR with optimal medical therapy (OMT) versus OMT alone in patients with secondary MR, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of 2 randomized clinical trials (RCT) and 7 non-randomized observational studies (nROS). Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were pooled through inverse variance random-effect model to compute the summary effect size for all-cause mortality, cardiovascular death and cardiac-related hospitalization. Subgroup and meta-regression analysis were also performed. Results An overall population of 3,118 individuals (67% men; mean age, 73 years) was included: 1,775 PMVR+OMT and 1,343 OMT patients, with mean follow-up of 24±15 months. PMVR+OMT was associated with a lower risk of all-cause death (HR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.68–0.87), cardiovascular death (HR: 0.55; 95% CI: 0.34–0.89) and cardiac-related hospitalization (HR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.64–0.92). Meta-regression analysis showed that larger left ventricular end-diastolic volume index (LVEDVI) portends higher mortality after PMVR (p<0.001). Conclusions This study-level meta-analysis shows that PMVR+OMT is associated with reduced all-cause death, cardiovascular death and cardiac-related hospitalization when compared with OMT alone in secondary MR. LVEDVI is a predictive marker of efficacy, as patients with smaller LVEDVI derive the largest benefit from PMVR.