1950
DOI: 10.1039/jr9500002038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

418. Carbon formation in flames

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
3

Year Published

1965
1965
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
16
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar "pyrolysis absorption" is observed in the flow-tube pyrolysis of pure hydrocarbons [9] a n d more recent investigation of this region shows that this absorption extends well into the visible portion of the spectrum [lo].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A similar "pyrolysis absorption" is observed in the flow-tube pyrolysis of pure hydrocarbons [9] a n d more recent investigation of this region shows that this absorption extends well into the visible portion of the spectrum [lo].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…the gas, we assume k' = Ko(+)1.7s (8) v = P r . t i (9) where Pr is the Prandtl number which typically takes a value around 0.80 for polyatomic gases [34]. For ethylene and nitrogen, the main constituents of the fuel side mixture in the regions of interest, tio is 0.12 and 0.22 cm2/sec respectively at 298 K. In the flame, the effective conductivity may be somewhat augmented by reaction.…”
Section: Zonementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the key precursors leading to the formation of carbon particles have not been identified, and many of the questions concerning possible mechanisms posed long ago are still open (Parker and Wolfhard, 1950). Recently, experimental techniques have achieved steady gains in the study of molecular species by mass spectrometry (Bittner and Howard, 1981;Olson and Calcote, 1981) and particles by laser light scattering (D' Alessio et al, 1977;Kent et al, 1981;Prado et al, 1981).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Again they found this inversely proportional to pressure, and their explanation is that this is due purely to the effect of pressure on the diffusion coefficient (and hence mixing) as this is also inversely proportional to pressure. Parker and Wolfhard (1950) using acetylene flames at sub-atmospheric pressures found a low pressure limit below which carbon was not formed, and above which carbon formation increased with pressure. Their burner consisted of two concentric tubes with flow rates adjusted to give equal air and fuel velocities.…”
Section: Diffusion Flamesmentioning
confidence: 97%