1964
DOI: 10.1039/jr9640002258
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

416. Synthesis and reactions of some cyclohexadienones

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4-Chloro-2-ethylbenzoic acid (18) was thus obtained using 2.3 equiv of LDA at -70°C. 13 The 4-bromo-2-ethylbenzoic acid (19) could be prepared from 17 employing the same protocol.…”
Section: Chemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…4-Chloro-2-ethylbenzoic acid (18) was thus obtained using 2.3 equiv of LDA at -70°C. 13 The 4-bromo-2-ethylbenzoic acid (19) could be prepared from 17 employing the same protocol.…”
Section: Chemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…b Analyses for C, H, Cl, and S are within ±0.4% of the expected value for the formula. c The starting material was 4-chloro-2,3-dimethylbenzoic acid 3 Physical Constants for 5-(Methylsulfonyl)benzoic Acid Methyl Esters 48 − 60 compdR 2 R 3 R 4 methodreaction temperature, a °Coverall yield, %mp, °Crecryst solventformula b 48 Me H Cl E 140 39 152−153 MeOH C 10 H 11 ClO 4 S 49 Me H F E 125 54 137−139 i -PrOH C 10 H 11 FO 4 S·0.25H 2 O 50 Me Cl Cl E 140 69 124−125 Et 2 O C 10 H 10 Cl 2 O 4 S 51 H H F E 140 24 108 i -PrOH C 9 H 9 FO 4 S 52 Et H Br E 120−130 45 102−104 ( i -Pr) 2 O C 11 H 13 BrO 4 S 53 Me H Br E 140 55 146−148 EtOAc C 10 H 11 BrO 4 S 54 Et H Cl E 140 59 98−100 i -PrOH C 11 H 13 ClO 4 S 55 F H F E 155 11 140 EtOAc C 9 H 8 F 2 O 4 S 56 Me Me Cl F 82 137 EtOAc C 11 H 13 ClO 4 S 57 Me H Me E 140 31 141−142 MeOH C 11 H 14 O 4 S 58 Cl H Cl E 140 43 154−155 EtOH C 9 H 8 Cl 2 O 4 S 59 c Me Me Me <...
…”
Section: Chemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1 : mp 146−147 °C (CH 2 Cl 2 / n -C 6 H 14 ) (lit . mp 146−147 °C); 1 H NMR (200 MHz, CDCl 3 ) δ 1.70 (d, 3H, J = 1.2 Hz), 6.46 (d, 2H, J = 8.8 Hz), 7.26 (d, 2H, J = 8.8 Hz); 13 C NMR (50 MHz, CDCl 3 ) δ 24.8 (q), 49.8 (s), 55.9 (s), 130.7 (d, 2C), 148.2 (d, 2C), 184.5 (s); IR (KBr) 1658 cm -1 ; HRMS m / z calcd for C 8 H 7 OBr 3 355.8046, found 355.8010, calcd for C 8 H 7 OBr 2 81 Br 357.8026, found 357.8031, calcd for C 8 H 7 OBr 81 Br 2 359.8006, found 359.8026, calcd for C 8 H 7 O 81 Br 3 361.7986, found 361.8008.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 : mp 117−118 °C ( n -C 6 H 14 ) (lit . mp 116−117 °C); 1 H NMR (200 MHz, CDCl 3 ) δ 1.68 (s, 3H), 1.98 (d, 3H, J = 1.4 Hz), 6.45 (d, 2H, J = 10.2 Hz), 7.00−7.03 (m, 1H), 7.22 (dd, 1H, J = 10.2, 3.4 Hz); 13 C NMR (50 MHz, CDCl 3 ) δ 16.3 (q), 24.7 (q), 51.2 (s), 55.9 (s), 130.6 (d), 137.6 (s), 143.4 (d), 147.9 (d), 185.2 (s); IR (KBr) 1662, 1638 cm -1 ; HRMS m / z calcd for C 9 H 9 OBr 3 369.8202, found 369.8230, calcd for C 9 H 9 OBr 2 81 Br 371.8182, found 371.8171, calcd for C 9 H 9 OBr 81 Br 2 373.8162, found 373.8148, calcd for C 9 H 9 O 81 Br 3 375.8142, found 375.8117.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%