2020
DOI: 10.1080/01480545.2020.1722155
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

4-Week toxicity study of biosimilar natalizumab in comparison to Tysabri® by repeated intravenous infusion to cynomolgus monkeys

Abstract: Subject of this validation was the quantitative determination of Tysabri ® (Natalizumab) in serum samples. This assay employed the quantitative antibody sandwich enzyme immunoassay technique (ELISA). A microtiter plate was coated with a specific anti-Natalizumab antibody.After blocking, calibration samples, quality control samples (QCs) or study samples were pipetted into the wells. After washing, the HRP-conjugated secondary anti-Natalizumab antibody

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 20 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…15,20,21 Previous pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic and safety studies in healthy participants provided evidence to support PB006 phase 3 studies involving patients with RRMS. 22,23 The primary objective of the Antelope study was to confirm equivalent efficacy between biosim-NTZ and ref-NTZ in patients with RRMS by assessing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based end points supported by clinical, safety, and immunogenicity secondary end point analyses. The potential impact of switching from ref-NTZ to biosim-NTZ on efficacy outcomes and immunogenicity was also assessed in a subpopulation analysis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15,20,21 Previous pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic and safety studies in healthy participants provided evidence to support PB006 phase 3 studies involving patients with RRMS. 22,23 The primary objective of the Antelope study was to confirm equivalent efficacy between biosim-NTZ and ref-NTZ in patients with RRMS by assessing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based end points supported by clinical, safety, and immunogenicity secondary end point analyses. The potential impact of switching from ref-NTZ to biosim-NTZ on efficacy outcomes and immunogenicity was also assessed in a subpopulation analysis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%