Motion Encoding in Language and Space 2012
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199661213.003.0004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

4 Verbs of aquamotion: semantic domains and lexical systems

Abstract: The current chapter elaborates on an approach which aims at the cross-linguistic comparison of lexical domains or (sub)systems. This approach is based on distinguishing among semantic domains which can be said to occur across languages and which are useful and relevant from a typological perspective. We illustrate this approach by exploring the conceptualization of motion / being in liquid medium (aquamotion), within which four general domains (swimming, sailing, drifting, and floating) are recognized. Using t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 185 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the work, the conceptual framework, developed taking into account achievements of modern linguistics in the field of spatial semantics [1,5,[14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21]. In addition, the characteristics of physical space selected by domestic and foreign linguists, the available classifications of lexical units with spatial semantics and the methodological principles of the theory of a metaphor are considered.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the work, the conceptual framework, developed taking into account achievements of modern linguistics in the field of spatial semantics [1,5,[14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21]. In addition, the characteristics of physical space selected by domestic and foreign linguists, the available classifications of lexical units with spatial semantics and the methodological principles of the theory of a metaphor are considered.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Divjak and Lemmens (2007) map out the lexical field in Dutch and Batoréo (2008) in European Portuguese. Koptjevskaja-Tamm andcolleagues (2010) compare Russian, Dutch, English, andSwedish, andLander andcolleagues (2012) investigate data from more than 40 different languages. Lander and colleagues (2012: 8) suggest a division of aquamotion into four basic sub-categories: swimming, sailing, drifting and floating, a categorization that has been observed by other studies as well (including Divjak and Lemmens, 2007;Batoréo, 2008;Koptjevskaja-Tamm et al, 2010).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since 2012 in Lander et al (2012Lander et al ( , 2013) the FLOATING domain has given ground to two domains, FLOATING and DRIFTING, but no basic conceptual distinction was observed in preferring four domains to three. The authors of the basic tripartition argue that it manifests itself more or less consistently in most languages of the sample the authors used by means of lexical oppositions and constraints on interpretation arising in the corresponding contexts.…”
Section: Basic Aqua-motion Typologymentioning
confidence: 99%