Linear Inequalities and Related Systems. (AM-38) 1957
DOI: 10.1515/9781400881987-005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

4. Theory of Linear Programming

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
66
0

Year Published

1957
1957
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their paper extends the notion of equivalence between linear programming and saddle value problems [see Goldman and Tucker,14] …”
Section: Part I Mathematical Programming Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Their paper extends the notion of equivalence between linear programming and saddle value problems [see Goldman and Tucker,14] …”
Section: Part I Mathematical Programming Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…f evaluated at the grid point x*. Because of where .f* i J the convexity of ^f(x) the polyhedral space defined by (14) contains the convex space ^f(x) < ^b entirely. As the grid width of the x* tends to zero the intersection of the polyhedral spaces (14) for i = 1, 2, ..., m tends to that described by (9).…”
Section: *N+l = 9(x)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From 125b and 126 we deduce that for any good, i, i e that is produced at a positive level, we must have ; t=0, 1, ..., ^This is lemma 4 on page 59, Goldman and Tucker (1956) where indicates the technically determined utilization rate (the amount of service-flow consumed) of the resource by the i^^ process at the unit level of intensity, i.e., for producing one unit of the i*"^ good, 1=1, 2; j=l, 2.…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…determined, as it would be in Q. However, Goldman and Tucker (1956) have shown that if both LP and D are feasible (as they are) then for any j, j e I j the following alternatives will hold:^ n 1. either 2 a..q. <b, for some optimal q and y.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation