Isms in Language Education 2017
DOI: 10.1515/9781501503085-005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

4. Native-speakerism and the betrayal of the native speaker language-teaching professional

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ideology of native-speakerism inherently consists of unequal power relations that are generally to the disadvantage of NNSs. Although it is uncommon, native speakers are also occasionally affected by this ideology (Lowe & Kiczkowiak, 2016;Rivers, 2017;Waters, 2007). One of the most important consequences of native-speakerism is the differential labeling of English teachers as native-English-speaking teachers (NESTs) or nonnative-English-speaking teachers (NNESTs).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ideology of native-speakerism inherently consists of unequal power relations that are generally to the disadvantage of NNSs. Although it is uncommon, native speakers are also occasionally affected by this ideology (Lowe & Kiczkowiak, 2016;Rivers, 2017;Waters, 2007). One of the most important consequences of native-speakerism is the differential labeling of English teachers as native-English-speaking teachers (NESTs) or nonnative-English-speaking teachers (NNESTs).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many scholars (e.g. Houghton & Rivers, 2013;Llurda, 2016;Rivers, , 2017, however, claimed that most studies undertaken within the movement were biased towards one group of teachers, NNESTs, by promoting the victimised identities of NNESTs at the expense of the other group, NESTs. They argued that the NNEST movement's efforts fail to acknowledge the professional status of NESTs by suggesting that they are merely qualified by birth and "praised on largely imagined criteria rather than on professional or academic measures of ability" (Rivers & Ross, 2013, p.52).…”
Section: The Dichotomy Between Nests and Nnestsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These publications have been strongly criticised as biased by many scholars (e.g. Houghton & Rivers, 2013;Llurda, 2016;Rivers, , 2017Selvi, 2010Selvi, , 2014, because of their disregard for NESTs' personal and professional experiences and other kinds of identity ascriptions and because of their portrayal of NESTs as monolinguals, merely qualified for ELT by birth. Most of these "critiqued" studies have focused only on one group of English teachers (i.e.…”
Section: Contributions To the Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation