2012
DOI: 10.1111/apaa.12003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

4 Mobility, Territorial Commitments, and Political Organization among Late Bronze Age Polities in Southern Caucasia

Abstract: In this case study of territoriality in Armenia's Late Bronze Age Tsaghkahovit Plain we examine land claims and political relations among fortified communities with highly varied subsistence and economic practices, including mobile pastoralism. Integral to political relations between fortress-based institutions and mobile subjects was the need to create highly legible places for political subjection, authorization, and action. However, the same social, political, economic, and religious institutions that help … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Related to ideas of political authority are questions surrounding the agro-pastoral economy. Investigations in Armenia have found LBA fortified sites clustered in foothills on the edges of arable plains, allowing fortress-based polities to control agricultural land (Smith et al, 2009: 396; Hammer, 2014), although this may have taken the form of remotely monitoring access rather than direct surveillance (Greene & Lindsay, 2013: 64–65). The LBA settlement at Tsaghkahovit South Lower Town, for example, is characterized as a ‘domestic complex occupied intermittently by seasonally mobile groups’ (Badalyan et al, 2014: 193–98), albeit with access to fields for growing crops.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Related to ideas of political authority are questions surrounding the agro-pastoral economy. Investigations in Armenia have found LBA fortified sites clustered in foothills on the edges of arable plains, allowing fortress-based polities to control agricultural land (Smith et al, 2009: 396; Hammer, 2014), although this may have taken the form of remotely monitoring access rather than direct surveillance (Greene & Lindsay, 2013: 64–65). The LBA settlement at Tsaghkahovit South Lower Town, for example, is characterized as a ‘domestic complex occupied intermittently by seasonally mobile groups’ (Badalyan et al, 2014: 193–98), albeit with access to fields for growing crops.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most ceramics from the mid-second millennium context at Varneti profile are domestic and utilitarian vessels rather than the decorated objects from the kurgan burials which allowed archaeologists in the twentieth century to identify a ‘Meskhetian variation of the Trialeti culture’ in the district between Zveli and Vardzia (Kakhiani et al, 2013: 4). The thick-walled storage and cooking vessels and animal bones suggest a semi-sedentary, pastoralist population, a significant result for understanding the transition from settled and agrarian to nomadic pastoral farming in the MBA of southern Caucasia (Greene & Lindsay, 2013: 56).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…18. The Tsaghkahovit plain has hosted a long sequence of archaeological investigations, most recently including those affiliated with the Project for the Archaeology and Geography of Ancient Transcaucasian Societies (ArAGATS); see Smith, Badalyan, and Avetisyan 2005;Smith et al 2003Smith et al , 2009Badalyan, Smith, and Khatchadourian 2018;Lindsay and Smith 2006, Greene and Lindsay 2013, Lindsay 2006Khatchadourian 2016;Greene 2012;Marshall 2014;Chazin 2016. This body of work has authoritatively framed the landscapes of Aragatsotn for prehistoric and classical periods.…”
Section: Why We Need New Silk Road Storiesmentioning
confidence: 99%