2004
DOI: 10.1107/s1600536804030053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

4-Hydroxy-2,6-dimethoxybenzaldehyde

Abstract: Key indicatorsSingle-crystal X-ray study T = 293 K Mean '(C±C) = 0.004 A Ê R factor = 0.054 wR factor = 0.120 Data-to-parameter ratio = 9.8For details of how these key indicators were automatically derived from the article, see

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our analysis of AGN contamination presented in Figure 4 suggests that AGN contamination does not significantly affect our measurement of the MZ relation. Similarly, Wuyts et al (2014) find that MZ relations they measure at z ∼ 1 and z ∼ 2 are insensitive to AGN contamination. This might be due to evolving ISM con-ditions which may result in a BPT diagram where the [NII]/Hα line ratios of AGN overlap with star-forming galaxies (e.g., Kewley et al 2013a,b).…”
Section: Systematic Issues In the Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our analysis of AGN contamination presented in Figure 4 suggests that AGN contamination does not significantly affect our measurement of the MZ relation. Similarly, Wuyts et al (2014) find that MZ relations they measure at z ∼ 1 and z ∼ 2 are insensitive to AGN contamination. This might be due to evolving ISM con-ditions which may result in a BPT diagram where the [NII]/Hα line ratios of AGN overlap with star-forming galaxies (e.g., Kewley et al 2013a,b).…”
Section: Systematic Issues In the Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…This might be due to evolving ISM con-ditions which may result in a BPT diagram where the [NII]/Hα line ratios of AGN overlap with star-forming galaxies (e.g., Kewley et al 2013a,b). Whatever the case, Figure 4 and results from Wuyts et al (2014) suggest that AGN contamination is not a significant source of bias.…”
Section: Systematic Issues In the Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 81%