Information Über Gestalt 1974
DOI: 10.1515/9783035601602.128
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

4. Höhe und Reinheit der Gestalt

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although as Frondizi points out, the subjectivist approach of Ehrenfels is alien to his project (in that he does not believe, contra Ehrenfels, that valuing an object is also desiring it), nevertheless, Ehrenfels's ontological approach is predictably close to Köhler et al in being relational (von Ehrenfels, 1897, 1898. According to Smith (1994):…”
Section: Value As a Gestalt Qualitymentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although as Frondizi points out, the subjectivist approach of Ehrenfels is alien to his project (in that he does not believe, contra Ehrenfels, that valuing an object is also desiring it), nevertheless, Ehrenfels's ontological approach is predictably close to Köhler et al in being relational (von Ehrenfels, 1897, 1898. According to Smith (1994):…”
Section: Value As a Gestalt Qualitymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Of course, for von Ehrenfels, an intentional relation merely refers to an intentional object, re-represented to consciousness, and a presentation. Smith, elsewhere, has reflected on the notion of organic unity to link von Ehrenfels to Gestalt theory but instead let us follow Frondizi's suggestion of using Ehrenfels's own innovation, the Gestaltqualität (von Ehrenfels, 1988).…”
Section: Value As a Gestalt Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since perceptual processing of the incoming information is necessary to be able to aesthetically evaluate our percept, the close relation between perception and aesthetics cannot be neglected. von Ehrenfels ( 1916 , 1922 ) called beauty nothing else than Gestalt height, which he defined as the product of unity (of the whole) and multiplicity (of the parts). Unity-in-variety is also a major principle in design (e.g., Post et al., 2016 ).…”
Section: Prägnanz In All Its Facetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A first way to characterize Prägnanz as a property is by defining it as Gestalt height or strength (Köhler, 1920 ; von Ehrenfels, 1916 , 1932/1937 ): Strong Gestalts are those Gestalts in which the mutual dependence among the parts is so great that there is no room for any displacement or changes without an influence on all other parts of the whole (Ash, 1995 ; Köhler, 1920 ). For example, a rose is a higher Gestalt than a heap of sand (von Ehrenfels, 1916 , 1932/1937 ).…”
Section: Prägnanz In All Its Facetsmentioning
confidence: 99%