2019
DOI: 10.1109/tbme.2019.2904885
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

4-D Flow MRI-Based Computational Analysis of Blood Flow in Patient-Specific Aortic Dissection

Abstract: Computational hemodynamics studies of aortic dissections usually combine patient-specific geometries with idealized or generic boundary conditions. In this study we present a comprehensive methodology for simulations of hemodynamics in type B aortic dissection (TBAD) based on fully patient-specific boundary conditions. Methods: Pre-operative 4D flow magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and Doppler-wire pressure measurements (pre-and post-operative) were acquired from a TBAD patient. These data were used to derive … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
50
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a recent study of 139 patients after TEVAR, chronic vs. acute DAD, rather than TBAD vs. rTAAD, impacted the procedure success. Nevertheless, since choice of indication in asymptomatic patients and TEVAR procedure remains challenging, the results may improve if 4D flow MRI data are used to predict post TEVAR hemodynamics and subsequently monitor the results . Thus, hemodynamic mapping throughout the stages of disease progression, as well as pre‐ and post‐surgery, will be an important next step in the understanding and improvement of risk‐stratification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent study of 139 patients after TEVAR, chronic vs. acute DAD, rather than TBAD vs. rTAAD, impacted the procedure success. Nevertheless, since choice of indication in asymptomatic patients and TEVAR procedure remains challenging, the results may improve if 4D flow MRI data are used to predict post TEVAR hemodynamics and subsequently monitor the results . Thus, hemodynamic mapping throughout the stages of disease progression, as well as pre‐ and post‐surgery, will be an important next step in the understanding and improvement of risk‐stratification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geometries of P1, P2 and P2P used for simulation. The primary entry tear (PET) in each model is indicated, as well as planes on which pressure readings were taken (A1-5, B1-2 and C1-2) 3D IVPs were extracted from the 4D MRI data of P1 and P2 using an in-house MATLAB processing tool, developed in our previous studies (Pirola et al 2018(Pirola et al , 2019. From the results obtained with the 3D IVP simulation, TP and flat velocity profiles were derived using Ansys EnSight (v10.2) and an additional in-house MATLAB tool.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 also includes the peak systolic velocity streamlines derived from the 4D MRI scan for P2. The equivalent 4D MRI data for P1 was previously reported by Pirola et al (2019). For validation of the computational methods used throughout this study, the streamlines obtained with 3D IVP for P1 and P2 were compared to their respective 4D MRI streamlines.…”
Section: Flow Patternsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geometrical accuracy has improved from the representation of only the dissected aorta with the upper branches 9 to the inclusion of the abdominal and visceral vessels. 21 Simplified 'static' outlet boundary conditions (BCs), such as constant pressure or prescribed flow splits, have been replaced by more physiologically-accurate 'dynamic' three-element Windkessel models (3WKs). 12 Recently, the limitation of the rigid wall assumption has also been overcome, with the implementation of fluid structure interaction (FSI) models able to simulate the motion of the aortic wall and IF.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Validation of patient-specific CFD simulations of AD is currently based on in vivo, 2D and 4D phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging (PC-MRI) data. 21 However, these modalities, when used in a clinical setting, have poor resolution and are often subject to noise. Few studies have attempted to combine in vitro and in silico approaches for the study of AD hitherto.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%