2002
DOI: 10.1075/pbns.94.06mci
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

4. Critical reflections on performativity and the‘un/doing’ of gender and sexuality in talk

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previously, Miller (2012) and McIlvenny (2002) also reflected on performativity and foreign language learning. Their studies concluded that learners' common sense understandings of perceived realities of language and of the native speaker are performatively constituted through ESL classroom interactions (Miller, 2012, p.89).…”
Section: Performativity Theory and Teletandemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously, Miller (2012) and McIlvenny (2002) also reflected on performativity and foreign language learning. Their studies concluded that learners' common sense understandings of perceived realities of language and of the native speaker are performatively constituted through ESL classroom interactions (Miller, 2012, p.89).…”
Section: Performativity Theory and Teletandemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been noted by others that a queer methodology needs to be developed to examine how people accomplish, transform and transgress gender and sexual identities, amongst others, in specific settings, including organisational settings (McIlvenny, 2002a;Speer and Potter, 2002;Speer, 2005;Fenstermaker and West, 2002;Moloney and Fenstermaker, 2002;2002b). The suggestion made by these writers, which I wish to follow, draws on other sociological approaches that also radically trouble and show the contested, constructed nature of identities, but in situ: ethnomethodology and conversation analysis.…”
Section: Queering Older Lgb Adultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rather, they re-sediment conventions of earlier iterations of discursive practices and thus serve as occasions for reconstituting social ideologies about language and learner subjectivity. McIlvenny (2002) emphasizes that such performative power comes not from single acts but from the "(re)citation of a prior chain of acts which are implied in the present act" (p. 116). Such chains of acts are considered here by using the metaphoric construct of sedimentation with respect to language and learning.…”
Section: Performativity Theory Language and Ideologymentioning
confidence: 97%