1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0076-6879(99)02006-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

[4] Comparison of enhanced green fluorescent protein and its destabilized form as transcription reporters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case, a smaller increase in fluorescence occurred immediately after the shift, but the promoter activity remained fairly constant, with a small decrease in rate. This may be a combined result of continued high rates of transcription during the transition between methanol-and succinate-growth modes, consistent with the results from flux analysis (Pedraza & van Oudenaarden, 2005), and of negligible degradation of GFPuv over time due to an in vivo half-life that is >24 h (Leveau & Lindow, 2001; Andersen et al , 1998; Zhao et al , 1999). …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…In this case, a smaller increase in fluorescence occurred immediately after the shift, but the promoter activity remained fairly constant, with a small decrease in rate. This may be a combined result of continued high rates of transcription during the transition between methanol-and succinate-growth modes, consistent with the results from flux analysis (Pedraza & van Oudenaarden, 2005), and of negligible degradation of GFPuv over time due to an in vivo half-life that is >24 h (Leveau & Lindow, 2001; Andersen et al , 1998; Zhao et al , 1999). …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…It is conceivable that nuclear import of newly synthesized transcription factor occurs at the same rate, but due to the experimental limitation of GFP maturation is picked up with a delay. Possibly, with a more sensitive microscopy set up providing higher temporal resolution, and by using faster maturing and/or faster decaying GFP variants, such as TurboGFP (Evdokimov., 2006 ) or labile GFPs (Deichsel., 1999 ; Zhao., 1999 ), it could be demonstrated that the cells actually respond and reach higher nuclear transcription factor concentrations much quicker.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This degron is directly fused to intrabodies that prevent misfolding of their target antigen [13, 14]. The degron used in this study is from mouse Ornithine Decarboxylase (ODC), a short-lived protein containing a C-terminal PEST degron that has been shown to heterologously reduce the half-life of GFP transcription reporters [1517]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%