Stars and Star Clusters
DOI: 10.1007/10057805_11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

4.3.1 Radiative transfer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
74
0

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
74
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For a more detailed discussion see e.g. Höflich (1987Höflich ( , 1990Höflich ( , 1995Baschek, Scholz, and Wehrse 1991) where it has been shown that the Doppler shift of the absorption of weak lines provides a good measurement of the last scattering radius. For non-spherical geometries the situation is even more complicated since the radial direction is not orthogonal to the shells of constant density.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a more detailed discussion see e.g. Höflich (1987Höflich ( , 1990Höflich ( , 1995Baschek, Scholz, and Wehrse 1991) where it has been shown that the Doppler shift of the absorption of weak lines provides a good measurement of the last scattering radius. For non-spherical geometries the situation is even more complicated since the radial direction is not orthogonal to the shells of constant density.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The observed apparent diameter changes dramatically within the given wavelength range due to the strong wavelength dependent opacity of the atmospheric constituents (Baschek et al 1991;Scholz 2001). For the O-rich stars, the measured diameters in the optical are sensitive to TiO bands.…”
Section: Wavelength Dependence Of the Diametermentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The consequence of a very extended atmosphere is a not clearly definable and measurable photospheric radius R phot 1 (e.g. Mennesson et al 2002;Tej et al 2003;Ohnaka 2004;Woodruff et al 2004;Fedele et al 2005) and observations at different wavelengths probe different atmospheric layers (Baschek et al 1991;Scholz 2001). The measured apparent diameters are correlated to the absorption and emission features of the most abundant and radiatively important molecular species (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various definitions for the radius can be found (cf. reviews by Baschek et al 1991;Scholz 2003), where the most commonly used radius in atmospheric modelling is the Rosseland radius. It is defined by the distance between the centre of the star and the layer having Rosseland optical depth τ ross = 2 3 .…”
Section: Effective Temperaturementioning
confidence: 99%