Garnets
DOI: 10.1007/10041375_21
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

4.1.5 Optical and magnetooptical properties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We, therefore, choose an optimum thickness 𝑑 of 8 nm. In contrast, BiIG has a 1 order of magnitude smaller |𝑄| ∼ 10 −3 , but 3 orders of magnitude smaller absorption coefficient and less reflection losses than Fe [34]. At the same time, phonon resonances in the garnet can distort and attenuate the THz pulse [35].…”
Section: Zts Detectorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We, therefore, choose an optimum thickness 𝑑 of 8 nm. In contrast, BiIG has a 1 order of magnitude smaller |𝑄| ∼ 10 −3 , but 3 orders of magnitude smaller absorption coefficient and less reflection losses than Fe [34]. At the same time, phonon resonances in the garnet can distort and attenuate the THz pulse [35].…”
Section: Zts Detectorsmentioning
confidence: 99%