2008
DOI: 10.1111/ddi.2008.14.issue-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The predicted LULC map (for 2026), climate data and occurrence records of glossy buckthorn were then inputted into a species distribution model called MaxEnt for studying the impact of future LUCC on the spatial distribution of glossy buckthorn. MaxEnt is a technique for modelling of geographic distributions of species with presence-only data, and it has the advantage of achieving high predictive accuracy (Wisz et al 2008;Elith and Leathwick 2009). The relative suitability was calculated for glossy buckthorn with the predicted 2026 LULC map.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The predicted LULC map (for 2026), climate data and occurrence records of glossy buckthorn were then inputted into a species distribution model called MaxEnt for studying the impact of future LUCC on the spatial distribution of glossy buckthorn. MaxEnt is a technique for modelling of geographic distributions of species with presence-only data, and it has the advantage of achieving high predictive accuracy (Wisz et al 2008;Elith and Leathwick 2009). The relative suitability was calculated for glossy buckthorn with the predicted 2026 LULC map.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We chose the maximum entropy modelling via the software program MaxEnt (Phillips, Anderson, and Schapire 2006) because we had presenceonly observations. MaxEnt is the preferred method for modelling with presence-only data due to its performance relative to alternative methods (Wisz et al 2008;Elith and Leathwick 2009;Merow, Smith, and Silander 2013) and because it does not require selection of pseudo-absences (where the assumption is that the environments are unsuitable), but rather background points (which describes the available landscape, but does not assume unsuitability, Merow, Smith, and Silander 2013). Presence records were aggregated to the 60-m scale to match the climatic and LULC predictors for model fitting (Merow et al 2016).…”
Section: Species Distribution Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet despite the widespread use and numerous applications of SDMs, how to effectively model species distribution remains a key issue. In the past decade, much research on effective modelling has been done, with the majority of studies concentrating on one or more of the following issues: (i) determining the significance of different environmental variables for species occurrence from statistical and ecological points of view (Stockwell and Peterson 2002); (ii) sampling issues, including sample size and generation of pseudoabsence points (Wisz et al 2008;VanDerWal et al 2009); and (iii) exploration, development and evaluation of new SDMs (De'Ath 2002;Phillips and Dudík 2008). Here, we concentrate on the first issuehow to select environmental variables for use in modelsas it is a precondition to successful modelling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%