3D wave-equation dispersion inversion of surface waves recorded on irregular topography

Abstract

Irregular topography can cause strong scattering and defocusing of propagating surface waves, so it is important to account for such effects when inverting surface waves for shallow S-wave velocity structures. We have developed a 3D surface-wave dispersion inversion method that takes into account the topographic effects modeled by a 3D spectral element solver. The objective function is the frequency summation of the squared wavenumber differences [Formula: see text] along each azimuthal angle of the fundamental mode or higher-order modes of Rayleigh waves in each shot gather. The wavenumbers [Formula: see text] associated with the dispersion curves are calculated using the data recorded along the irregular free surface. Numerical tests on synthetic and field data demonstrate that 3D topographic wave equation dispersion inversion (TWD) can accurately invert for the S-wave velocity model from surface-wave data recorded on irregular topography. Field data tests for data recorded across an Arizona fault demonstrate that, for this example, the 2D TWD model can be as accurate as the 3D tomographic model. This suggests that in some cases, the 2D TWD inversion is preferred over 3D TWD because of its significant reduction in computational costs. Compared to the 3D P-wave velocity tomogram, the 3D S-wave tomogram agrees much more closely with the geologic model taken from the trench log. The agreement with the trench log is even better when the [Formula: see text] tomogram is computed, which reveals a sharp change in velocity across the fault. The localized velocity anomaly in the [Formula: see text] tomogram is in very good agreement with the well log. Our results suggest that integrating the [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] tomograms can sometimes give the most accurate estimates of the subsurface geology across normal faults.

Wave Equation Dispersion Inversion of Distributed Acoustic Sensing Data

“…The WD procedure is more robust than FWI because it replaces complicated surface‐wave arrivals with simple dispersion curves in the wavenumber domains. It does not require the layered assumption of 1D dispersion inversion, which is widely applied in near‐surface 2D and 3D irregular topography velocity tomograms (Li, Hanafy et al., 2019; Li, Lin et al., 2019; Liu et al., 2020).…”