2017
DOI: 10.1002/mp.12077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D volume reconstruction from serial breast specimen radiographs for mapping between histology and 3D whole specimen imaging

Abstract: Purpose: In breast imaging, radiological in vivo images, such as x-ray mammography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), are used for tumor detection, diagnosis, and size determination. After excision, the specimen is typically sliced into slabs and a small subset is sampled. Histopathological imaging of the stained samples is used as the gold standard for characterization of the tumor microenvironment. A 3D volume reconstruction of the whole specimen from the 2D slabs could facilitate bridging the gap between… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(64 reference statements)
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The T 2 ‐weighted image from the reference slice of the fresh specimen was registered to the T 2 ‐weighted image of the fixed specimen by a 2D rigid registration using a block‐matching strategy and correlation coefficient as similarity measure …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The T 2 ‐weighted image from the reference slice of the fresh specimen was registered to the T 2 ‐weighted image of the fixed specimen by a 2D rigid registration using a block‐matching strategy and correlation coefficient as similarity measure …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This prior work first reconstructs an initial volume estimate from the slices and then registers this reconstructed volume to the reference. Some works focus on the reconstruction problem because registration between a reconstructed volume and a reference is relatively standard (Stille et al, 2013;Dauguet et al, 2007;Mertzanidou et al, 2017); other works discuss on the reconstruction problem in an absence of reference volumes (Ourselin et al, 2001;Cifor et al, 2011;Ju et al, 2006;Bagci and Bai, 2010). Initial work reconstructed the experimental volume by pairwise registration of adjacent slices (Stille et al, 2013;Ourselin et al, 2001;Cifor et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Ju et al (Ju et al, 2006) reduced error propagation by warping each slice with a weighted linear and nonlinear combination of warp fields to multiple adjacent slices. Others use blockface images (Dauguet et al, 2007) or select internal reference slices to reconstruct small chunks and then put together the entire volume (Bagci and Bai, 2010;Mertzanidou et al, 2017). However, with almost every slice at least slightly distorted, internal nonrigid registration will likely change the original shape of biological structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MRI does not yield microscopic resolution, but produces undistorted 3D volumes. 23 Therefore, the combination of these two modalities offers a solution to the problem of imaging 24 the human brain at high resolution in 3D. In fact, successful large-scale projects like BigBrain [4] 25 or the Allen Atlas [5] have shown important advancements in terms of creating new whole-brain 26 atlases with cellular-level resolution.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…71 Despite not being spatially comprehensive, approaches based on selected regions of interest 72 (ROIs) have a high clinical relevance, mainly because of their potential applications in oncology. 73 It is no surprise, then, that several studies have combined MRI with histopathology for cancer 74 applications: examples include breast cancer [23,24], pancreatic tumors [25] and gliomas [26]. 75 These examples lay the foundation for future 3D histopathology, especially given the parallel 76 effort in tridimensional reconstruction for confocal microscopy [27].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%