2022
DOI: 10.3390/rs14071709
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D Visualization Techniques for Analysis and Archaeological Interpretation of GPR Data

Abstract: The non-invasive detection and digital documentation of buried archaeological heritage by means of geophysical prospection is increasingly gaining importance in modern field archaeology and archaeological heritage management. It frequently provides the detailed information required for heritage protection or targeted further archaeological research. High-resolution magnetometry and ground-penetrating radar (GPR) became invaluable tools for the efficient and comprehensive non-invasive exploration of complete ar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some of these software tools are also used to achieve a 3D visualization of GPR timeslices, such as GPR-Slice where time-slices and vertical profiles can be visualized within a cube, meaning in two dimensions but with a three-dimensional impression. Furthermore, various studies address the issue of managing large datasets and their interpretation by exploring possible procedures to identify and model archaeological features from GPR data [14][15][16][17][18]. Other significant experiences integrated GPR and resistivity data, both having a three-dimensional nature, to obtain a 3D visualization [19][20][21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of these software tools are also used to achieve a 3D visualization of GPR timeslices, such as GPR-Slice where time-slices and vertical profiles can be visualized within a cube, meaning in two dimensions but with a three-dimensional impression. Furthermore, various studies address the issue of managing large datasets and their interpretation by exploring possible procedures to identify and model archaeological features from GPR data [14][15][16][17][18]. Other significant experiences integrated GPR and resistivity data, both having a three-dimensional nature, to obtain a 3D visualization [19][20][21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multi-channel systems speed up data acquisition and allow full wave-field recording at the same time. Moreover, the use of 3D imaging techniques has produced more realistic and high-resolution images of buried archeological remains, such as villages [86,87], megalithic structures as in the case of Stonehenge [88], and ancient necropolises [89,90], which permits not only finding, but also obtaining volumetric reconstructions, thus allowing archeologists to restore the original appearance of the site [91].…”
Section: Gpr Applications In Archeology and Cultural Heritagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to seismic in oil and gas exploration, interpretation of GPR data is based primarily on reflector patterns, using radar facies to analyze rock formations in the underground medium [19,24,25]. The interface and internal structure of a geological body are interpreted in terms of the amplitude, configuration, and continuity of the reflector and its external geometry [26][27][28]. There have been many successful cases of GPR in various clastic depositional environments, and it is capable of solving geometric problems at the scale of architectural elements and bedforms.…”
Section: Interpretation Of Gpr Datamentioning
confidence: 99%