All Days 2010
DOI: 10.2118/134582-ms
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D Visualization and Classification of Pore Structure and Pore Filling in Gas Shales

Abstract: Shale gas is a growing resource worldwide as many basins are being explored and produced. However, little is still known and understood about two key parameters in gas shales: the gas-filled porosity and permeability. Digital rock physics technique, presented in this paper, contains three basic steps: (a) 3D CT imaging at 200 nanometer resolution, and/or FIB-SEM (focused ion beam combined with SEM) imaging at 3-15 nanometer resolution (b) segmentation of the digital volume to quantitatively identify the compon… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The conventional analytical methods applied to sandstone/carbonate reservoirs are not suitable for characterizing nanometer-scale pore networks in shale reservoirs. , Until present, a couple of advanced analytical techniques have been applied to characterize pore networks in shale reservoirs, including low-pressure gas adsorption (LPGA), mercury injection capillary pressure (MICP), field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM), ,, transmission electron microscopy (TEM), atomic force microscopy (AFM), computed tomography (CT) scanning, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), and small-angle neutron scattering (SANS/USANS) techniques. However, these methods have their own advantages and limitations in characterizing pores with different sizes. FE-SEM and TEM can only qualitatively characterize mesopores and macropores, failing to capture micropores because of resolution limitation .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conventional analytical methods applied to sandstone/carbonate reservoirs are not suitable for characterizing nanometer-scale pore networks in shale reservoirs. , Until present, a couple of advanced analytical techniques have been applied to characterize pore networks in shale reservoirs, including low-pressure gas adsorption (LPGA), mercury injection capillary pressure (MICP), field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM), ,, transmission electron microscopy (TEM), atomic force microscopy (AFM), computed tomography (CT) scanning, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), and small-angle neutron scattering (SANS/USANS) techniques. However, these methods have their own advantages and limitations in characterizing pores with different sizes. FE-SEM and TEM can only qualitatively characterize mesopores and macropores, failing to capture micropores because of resolution limitation .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to its potential impact on gas storage and production, shale reservoir properties have been extensively studied. Scanning electric microscopy (SEM) [3][4][5][6], atomic-force microscopy (AFM) [7], mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP) [8], computed tomography (CT) scanning ( [9,10], nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) [11], low-pressure gas adsorption (LPGA) [12], and small angle X-ray and neutron scattering are all used to evaluate the reservoir potential of shales [13,14]. Compared with other methods, LPGA experiments are cost-effective and can provide quantitative information on the pore system in shale.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past decade, micro-computed-tomography (μCT; synchrotron-based and bench-top instruments) has become a frequently used technique to study porous media and geological samples [8][9][10][11]. Together with nuclear resonance (MRI) and acoustic techniques, X-ray-based tomography is one of the few nondestructive techniques that give detailed insight into the structure of porous media over length scales ranging down to a few hundred nanometers [12,13]. The resolution of MRI depends primarily on the strength of the applied magnetic field gradient and can theoretically be increased to the wavelength of the scattering vector.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%