Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.pepi.2014.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D velocity distribution of P- and S-waves in a biotite gneiss, measured in oil as the pressure medium: Comparison with velocity measurements in a multi-anvil pressure apparatus and with texture-based calculated data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This method was recently refined to allow simultaneous measurement of P and S waves in arbitrary directions at hydrostatic pressures up to 2 R.N. Vasin et al 100 MPa (Lokajíček et al 2014). Here we follow up on previous work where elastic wave velocities have been measured on spheres and cubes (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method was recently refined to allow simultaneous measurement of P and S waves in arbitrary directions at hydrostatic pressures up to 2 R.N. Vasin et al 100 MPa (Lokajíček et al 2014). Here we follow up on previous work where elastic wave velocities have been measured on spheres and cubes (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a more detailed description of the measuring procedure, see Lokajíček et al . [] and Lokajíček and Svitek [].…”
Section: Sample Experimental Techniques and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shear wave velocities measured on the sphere are systematically lower than those measured on the cube. Similar observations were already made on a foliated biotite gneiss from Outokumpu [ Lokajíček et al ., ]. The differences are probably due to the differences in the geometry of the samples with flat surfaces for cube and curved surfaces for sphere, with limitations for the transducer‐sample assembly.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the first case the neutron diffraction gave the best results [Ivankina et al, 2005;Lokajicek et al, 2014;Barreiro et al, 2015] while in the second case the image analysis of thin section or -computed tomography ( -CT) are preferred [Jerram and Higgins, 2007]. The information provided by these methods are rather complementary as the neutron diffraction data refer to the mineral lattices CPO while the optical methods evidence only Figure 2.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%