2019
DOI: 10.1785/0120180020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D Surface Displacement and Surface Ruptures Associated with the 2014 Mw 6.2 Nagano Earthquake Using Differential Lidar

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7). Simple subtraction allows us to estimate the dip slip of the PE to be 1.7 ± 0.3 m and that of the APE to be 2.9 ± 0.5 m. Since the dip slip of the most recent event at Oide was 1.2 ± 0.1 m (Ishimura et al, 2019), the slip of the PE was a little larger than that of the 2014 event. Similar conclusions are given by Katsube et al (2017), that is, the PE showed a slightly smaller displacement than the 2014 slip on the paleoseismic trench walls in the center of the 2014 surface rupture zone (Iimori site in Fig.…”
Section: Cumulative Dip Slip Of Mapped Terracesmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…7). Simple subtraction allows us to estimate the dip slip of the PE to be 1.7 ± 0.3 m and that of the APE to be 2.9 ± 0.5 m. Since the dip slip of the most recent event at Oide was 1.2 ± 0.1 m (Ishimura et al, 2019), the slip of the PE was a little larger than that of the 2014 event. Similar conclusions are given by Katsube et al (2017), that is, the PE showed a slightly smaller displacement than the 2014 slip on the paleoseismic trench walls in the center of the 2014 surface rupture zone (Iimori site in Fig.…”
Section: Cumulative Dip Slip Of Mapped Terracesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This is because Okumura identified events based on angular unconformity, which is probably insensitive to small displacements near the surface. The fact that Okumura's trench sites experienced a broad uplift (~ 20-30 cm) without any apparent surface break (Ishimura et al, 2019) also justifies our choice of the minimum value. The maximum simulated slip limit is based on a compilation of paleoearthquake records at 42 sites over the entire ISTL (Maruyama et al, 2010).…”
Section: Inter-event Variability In Coseismic Slip At Oidementioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…4b), suggesting that more than half of the actual vertical displacement took place off the fault trace. Crustal displacements derived from geodetic methods such as optical correlation of aerial photographs (e.g., Milliner et al 2015) and differential lidar (e.g., Ishimura et al 2019) usually indicate the total slip on the underlying seismogenic fault, including displacement accommodated by flexure, splay faulting, and tapering, and InSAR analysis is no exception (Scott et al 2019). Therefore, our field measurements of the rupture are not considered to be anomalous.…”
Section: Coseismic Surface Ruptures Of the 2011 And 2016 Eventsmentioning
confidence: 99%