2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D statistical failure analysis of monolithic dental ceramic crowns

Abstract: For adhesively retained ceramic crown of various types, it has been clinically observed that the most catastrophic failures initiate from the cement interface as a result of radial crack formation as opposed to Hertzian contact stresses originating on the occlusal surface. In this work, a 3D failure prognosis model is developed for interface initiated failures of monolithic ceramic crowns. The surface flaw distribution parameters determined by biaxial flexural tests on ceramic plates and point-to-point variati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides, since the axial wall does not directly carry the occlusal load, the thickness decreases towards the margin, moreover, the stress in the wall increases with debonding as it progresses from the margin, which may facilitate crack initiation and growth from defects in the ceramic, and eventually lead to fracture of the restoration. This prediction is in good agreement with the case studies for all-ceramic crowns that most failures did not initiate from the contact surface, but at the resin cement interface [61] or the margin areas of the crown [15].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Besides, since the axial wall does not directly carry the occlusal load, the thickness decreases towards the margin, moreover, the stress in the wall increases with debonding as it progresses from the margin, which may facilitate crack initiation and growth from defects in the ceramic, and eventually lead to fracture of the restoration. This prediction is in good agreement with the case studies for all-ceramic crowns that most failures did not initiate from the contact surface, but at the resin cement interface [61] or the margin areas of the crown [15].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…These analyses have all been based on maximum principal stress distributions. In analyzing failure probability with respect to ceramic fractures, the maximum tensile stress tangential to the surface, rather than the maximum principal stress, has primary importance in the fracture process (Nasrin et al 2016). In this work, we propose methodology that predicts the fatigue survival probability and probable fracture origin for a thin-walled monolithic ceramic crown by combining 3D FE analysis with statistical fracture mechanics-based concepts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…How well this approximation method can be utilized for actual restoration geometries is not known and further work would be needed. However, based on our prior work [13, 36], the high stress region was found to be relatively small in both the simple trilayer restoration and in an actual crown geometry even if the wall thickness is quite thin. Despite the differences in geometry, the maximum stress (47.0 MPa) for 1 mm thick LD trilayer under 300N load was somewhat similar to the maximum stress (57.7 MPa) for an actual thin-walled crown restoration under 500N load [13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%