2022
DOI: 10.21014/acta_imeko.v11i2.1219
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D shape measurement techniques for human body reconstruction

Abstract: <p>In this work the performances of three different techniques for 3D scanning have been investigated. In particular two commercial tools (smartphone camera and iPad Pro LiDAR) and a structured light scanner (Go!SCAN 50) have been used for the analysis. First of all, two different subjects have been scanned with the three different techniques and the obtained 3D model were analysed in order to evaluate the respective reconstruction accuracy. A case study involving a child was then considered, with the ma… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 32 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A fixed camera is used a reference and its performance is compared with those of three scanning techniques, namely structured light scanner (SL), LIDAR (L), photogrammetry with high resolution camera (Pc), and an autonomous, low-cost photogrammetry system (Pl). The performances in reproducing the plant shape are assessed with the purpose of developing and standardizing a low-cost procedure to monitor the crop growth, saving time and resources [7,8]. Indeed, while 2D measurement performed by a fixed camera allows for a real-time monitoring thanks to sub-hourly image acquisition, on the other hand it would probably not be a feasible solution in a greenhouse, especially in vertical farms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A fixed camera is used a reference and its performance is compared with those of three scanning techniques, namely structured light scanner (SL), LIDAR (L), photogrammetry with high resolution camera (Pc), and an autonomous, low-cost photogrammetry system (Pl). The performances in reproducing the plant shape are assessed with the purpose of developing and standardizing a low-cost procedure to monitor the crop growth, saving time and resources [7,8]. Indeed, while 2D measurement performed by a fixed camera allows for a real-time monitoring thanks to sub-hourly image acquisition, on the other hand it would probably not be a feasible solution in a greenhouse, especially in vertical farms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%