2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-03635-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D Recording and Interpretation for Maritime Archaeology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It must be stressed that a similar approach was adopted previously in both natural-and historical-heritage-related settings: for example, the monitoring of erosion on cliffs and rock walls (Abellán et al 2011;Lim et al 2005;Obanawa and Hayakawa 2018) and at underwater archaeological (Ferentinos et al 2020;McCarthy et al 2019), and the structural pathologies suffered by certain archaeological and architectural features (Benavides López et al 2020;Lai et al 2019;Tapete et al 2013). Other works have similar aims, although they emphasise the theoretical and experimental dimensions (Daire et al 2012;López-Romero et al 2014) and use different tools and analytical approaches.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It must be stressed that a similar approach was adopted previously in both natural-and historical-heritage-related settings: for example, the monitoring of erosion on cliffs and rock walls (Abellán et al 2011;Lim et al 2005;Obanawa and Hayakawa 2018) and at underwater archaeological (Ferentinos et al 2020;McCarthy et al 2019), and the structural pathologies suffered by certain archaeological and architectural features (Benavides López et al 2020;Lai et al 2019;Tapete et al 2013). Other works have similar aims, although they emphasise the theoretical and experimental dimensions (Daire et al 2012;López-Romero et al 2014) and use different tools and analytical approaches.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparison with marine geophysical surveys, underwater photogrammetry is much more accessible and less expensive (McCarthy & Benjamin, 2014). Therefore, the method is very common in underwater archaeological prospection studies, allowing the mapping of entire sites (e.g., Galili et al, 2019;McCarthy et al, 2019;McCarthy & Benjamin, 2014).…”
Section: Summary Of the Main Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A powerful method for documentation of cultural heritage sites has been recently employed using underwater photogrammetry (e.g., Pacheco-Ruiz et al, 2018). It should be noted that 3-D underwater photogrammetry is one of the most powerful ways to demonstrate hidden archaeological sites or palaeo-landscapes using virtual reality and dissemination for the general public (McCarthy et al, 2019).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This work is intended to introduce a new methodology to the field of underwater archaeology that can be used in conjunction with existing methodologies. Maritime shipwrecks represent a major resource to understand the human past over thousands of years, but underwater archaeology is expensive, misappropriated, and hazardous [1][2][3][4]. Therefore, a methodology to automatically map all potential shipwrecks over a large geographic area accurately and rapidly can help archaeologists prioritize site selection and plan excavation [5].…”
Section: Introduction 1objective and Broader Importancementioning
confidence: 99%