2016
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153985
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D Reconstruction of the Human Airway Mucosa In Vitro as an Experimental Model to Study NTHi Infections

Abstract: We have established an in vitro 3D system which recapitulates the human tracheo-bronchial mucosa comprehensive of the pseudostratified epithelium and the underlying stromal tissue. In particular, we reported that the mature model, entirely constituted of primary cells of human origin, develops key markers proper of the native tissue such as the mucociliary differentiation of the epithelial sheet and the formation of the basement membrane. The infection of the pseudo-tissue with a strain of NonTypeable Haemophi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
32
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(37 reference statements)
2
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…; Marrazzo et al. ). However, the use of primary cells directly from patients in our previous work demonstrated the issue of donor‐to‐donor variation (Hill et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…; Marrazzo et al. ). However, the use of primary cells directly from patients in our previous work demonstrated the issue of donor‐to‐donor variation (Hill et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The Alvetex â scaffold used in this study provides an inert and stable physical 3D microenvironment that enables cells to more closely recapitulate their native morphology (Maltman & Przyborski, 2010). Porous polystyrene scaffolds have previously been used successfully to develop complex multicellular tissue structures (Hill et al 2015;Marrazzo et al 2016). However, the use of primary cells directly from patients in our previous work demonstrated the issue of donor-to-donor variation (Hill et al 2015), further highlighting the need for cells to undergo quality control prior to their use in skin models, which can be achieved through the use of commercially available cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Primary cells obtained directly from patients through lung resections, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid extraction, and biopsies offer a more patient-specific phenotype compared to immortalized cell lines [142,143]. The utility of these cell lines is increased when used as structurally representative models such as air-liquid interface (ALI) cultures, which facilitate cell differentiation and the development of structural features such as cilia [144][145][146]. A noteworthy drawback of using in vitro cultured cells is their removal from the extracellular matrix and milieu of inflammatory cells, potentially skewing readouts and resulting in poor translational value for clinical application [143].…”
Section: In Vitro Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are typically generated by sequential cell seeding into cell culture inserts or porous 3D scaffolds. Of these, bone and cartilage [19], and epithelia such as skin [20,21], or lung [22] are currently the most advanced, while models of more complex tissues such as the brain are at earlier stages of development. Notably, organ models may vary in their complexity and, hence, predictivity.…”
Section: Conventional Tissue Engineering (Te) Approaches and 3d Bioprmentioning
confidence: 99%