2010
DOI: 10.1007/s00044-010-9468-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D-QSAR and docking studies on pyridopyrazinones as BRAF inhibitors

Abstract: BRAF has become an important and exciting therapeutic target toward human cancer. 3D-QSAR and docking studies were performed to explore the interaction of the BRAF with a series of pyridopyrazinones. The comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA) and comparative molecular similarity indices analysis (CoMSIA) methods were carried out in terms of their potential for predictability. The CoMFA and CoMSIA models using 71 compounds in the training set gave r cv 2 values of 0.567 and 0.662, r 2 values of 0.900 and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies have constructed the validated QSAR models for designing new drugs against the BRAF protein (Table ). Most of them utilized 3D descriptors calculated from comparative molecular force field and comparative molecular similarity indices analysis models. They also applied the PLS as a regression model with steric, electrostatic, hydrophobic, and hydrogen bonding between the drug and target as molecular descriptors. The training datasets of previous studies included 27–243 compounds, while the test datasets comprised 15–189 compounds.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have constructed the validated QSAR models for designing new drugs against the BRAF protein (Table ). Most of them utilized 3D descriptors calculated from comparative molecular force field and comparative molecular similarity indices analysis models. They also applied the PLS as a regression model with steric, electrostatic, hydrophobic, and hydrogen bonding between the drug and target as molecular descriptors. The training datasets of previous studies included 27–243 compounds, while the test datasets comprised 15–189 compounds.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 3D-QSAR experiments, the structure alignment of compounds will directly affect the establishment of subsequent 3D models, so it is very important to select appropriate structure alignment methods for compounds ( Li et al, 2005 ; Patel et al, 2008 ; Ai et al, 2011 ). Ligand-based alignment was used in this experiment ( Figure 2 ) since compound 19g was the compound with the best compound activity in the dataset, all compounds were aligned with compound 19g as a template.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CoMFA and CoMSIA methods were applied to build 3D-QSAR models using the structural parameters as independent variables and the binding free energy as the dependent variable to obtain the relationship between the binding free energy and molecular structure. In construction of the 3D-QSAR model, molecular alignment is an important step [ 42 ]. In this approach, decachlorobiphenyl, which had the largest binding free energy, was used as the template to align the remaining PCBs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%