2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.dsp.2022.103784
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D PSwinBTS: An efficient transformer-based Unet using 3D parallel shifted windows for brain tumor segmentation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3D PSwinBTS [126] 20.40 68.60 TRSF-Net [147] -274.09 SF-SegFormer [153] 1.00 -UNesT [155] 87.30 261.70 TW-Net [156] 30.09 5.81…”
Section: Methods Param (M) Flops (G)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…3D PSwinBTS [126] 20.40 68.60 TRSF-Net [147] -274.09 SF-SegFormer [153] 1.00 -UNesT [155] 87.30 261.70 TW-Net [156] 30.09 5.81…”
Section: Methods Param (M) Flops (G)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[19] Hatamizadeh et al [125] proposed a Swin UNEt TRansformer (Swin UNETR) model replacing the encoder with the Swin Transformer [49] to capture multi-scale features in the partitioning scheme with shifted windows. Similar to the Swin UNETR, [125] Liang et al [126] embedded the Swin Transformer [49] into the encoder structure using parallel shift windows. They further supplemented prior knowledge to realize semantic modeling more efficiently.…”
Section: Brain Tumor Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly, the scholarly paper authored by Nian et al [32] presents a novel brain tumor segmentation strategy via a 3D transformer-based approach. The Fusion-Head Self-Attention Mechanism (FHSA) leverages the long-range spatial dependency of 3D MRI data.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The residual mix transformer fusion net is employed in reference [28], where it results in a dice score of 0.821. Also using the Infinite Deformable Fusion Transformer Module (IDFTM) with PSwinBTS references [32] and [35]achieve dice scores of 89.2% and 88.65%, respectively.…”
Section: Comparative Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%