2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10439-016-1668-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D-Printing Technologies for Craniofacial Rehabilitation, Reconstruction, and Regeneration

Abstract: The treatment of craniofacial defects can present many challenges due to the variety of tissue-specific requirements and the complexity of anatomical structures in that region. 3D-printing technologies provide clinicians, engineers and scientists with the ability to create patient-specific solutions for craniofacial defects. Currently, there are 3 key strategies that utilize these technologies to restore both appearance and function to patients: rehabilitation, reconstruction and regeneration. In rehabilitatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
130
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 162 publications
(131 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
1
130
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, manufacturing technique is useful to create physical models for different medical and pharmacological application based on three-dimensional (3D) computed data [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. All these applications strongly rely on material properties such as mechanical and thermal characteristics, biocompatibility, and in the last years, the antibacterial capability became important factor because of the undesirable infections.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, manufacturing technique is useful to create physical models for different medical and pharmacological application based on three-dimensional (3D) computed data [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. All these applications strongly rely on material properties such as mechanical and thermal characteristics, biocompatibility, and in the last years, the antibacterial capability became important factor because of the undesirable infections.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our opinion based on the presented results, prototyping of anatomical models can aid the surgeon in planning the intervention, by actually manipulating a 3D model of the structure, which is intuitively better than only seeing the 3D reconstruction on screen. Our proposal sums to pioneering examples of surgical planning aided by 3D image reconstruction and patient avatars, either supported by physical prototypes or not, which have proven successful for bone tumor surgeries [17], for craniofacial surgeries [18], for orthognathic surgery [19], for kidney surgeries [20], for general surgery [21], and for heart surgery [22], to cite just some relevant studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, 3D printing technology effectively guided the operative process, allowed accurate completion of the scheduled operative plan, and effectively shortened the operative time. Similarly, this approach not only avoided the body temperature loss, brain tissue swelling and wound hemorrhage caused by prolonged dural exposure during the operation but also reduced the surgical trauma [5]. Pre-expanding the scalp adjacent to the skull defect area and covering the skull repair material with expanded scalp flaps effectively prevented the exposure-related complications of repair with common materials and repaired the scar baldness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%