The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-021-07213-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D printing in construction: state of the art and applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pioneering technological strides have seen 3D printing revolutionize diverse sectors like soft robotics and construction, although certain concerns remain [70]. Soft robotics have benefitted tremendously from 3D printing, with applications spanning from minimally invasive surgical instruments to intelligent valves [71].…”
Section: Tracing the Growth And Impact Of 3d Printingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pioneering technological strides have seen 3D printing revolutionize diverse sectors like soft robotics and construction, although certain concerns remain [70]. Soft robotics have benefitted tremendously from 3D printing, with applications spanning from minimally invasive surgical instruments to intelligent valves [71].…”
Section: Tracing the Growth And Impact Of 3d Printingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite this basic familiarity, research shows that practitioners require a deeper understanding of the implementation notion at hand. According to Besklubova et al, Elias Ali and Pan et al [58][59][60], while this is an obvious need for the residential construction industry, earlier research on residential 3D building in Malaysia has not made the connection to OPS. A project is regarded as successful if it is finished on schedule, under budget, and to a high enough quality standard as determined by OPS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such actions may be the by-product of a desire to forecast the impact of digital design tools and technologies used in practices today (Wang et al, 2020), especially for the popularisation such digital design processes to be adopted in architectural and construction industries (Li and Zhao, 2016). In fact, both Siddika et al (2019) and Pan et al (2021) have argued that apart from Singapore and China, governments are yet to set a national building code for digitalisation in AEC for local applications. In turn, the absence of such popularisation and building standards limit the opportunities for digitalisation of design processes to assist in the design of housing for individuals with specific and dynamic needs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%