2016
DOI: 10.1159/000448024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D Printing for Left Atrial Appendage (LAA) Modeling Based on Transesophageal Echocardiography: A Step Forward in Closure with LAA Devices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
(56 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) has certain advantages over cardiac CT in displaying the heart's soft tissue or valves [34][35][36][37]. Significant improvements to the spatial and temporal resolutions of transthoracic and transesophageal 3D echocardiography make it another alternative technology for acquiring reliable source data for 3D printing [38][39][40][41].…”
Section: Imaging Data Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) has certain advantages over cardiac CT in displaying the heart's soft tissue or valves [34][35][36][37]. Significant improvements to the spatial and temporal resolutions of transthoracic and transesophageal 3D echocardiography make it another alternative technology for acquiring reliable source data for 3D printing [38][39][40][41].…”
Section: Imaging Data Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10,12,13 Such complications include LAA perforation, pericardial effusion/tamponade, device embolization/migration, air/ clot embolism, and compression of the left circumflex artery. 4,14,15 Published complication rates range from 2.2% to 9.9% 4,5,16,17 and decline with increasing number of procedures, suggesting an important role for the procedural learning curve. 4 To address the complication risk with improper device sizing/ positioning, 3D printing (3DP) of LAA models has recently emerged in the literature, first being described in 2015.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Improper device sizing and its resulting intraprocedural device/catheter exchanges increase the risk of complications 10,12,13 . Such complications include LAA perforation, pericardial effusion/tamponade, device embolization/migration, air/clot embolism, and compression of the left circumflex artery 4,14,15 . Published complication rates range from 2.2% to 9.9% 4,5,16,17 and decline with increasing number of procedures, suggesting an important role for the procedural learning curve 4 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In previous studies, the original data of the 3D model were derived from CT and MRI results. 10,11 Combining 3DP with ultra sound imaging, constructing the 3DPM of structured heart disease using the original data of 3D echocardiography, 12 and evaluating preoperative information may provide more accurate information for clinical applications. 8,9 However, CT exam ination involves ionizing radiation, and MRI is associated with strict selection of patients, high cost, and a long examination length; therefore, it is difficult to use these technologies to acquire origi nal data for the 3D model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, because echocardiography is a simple process with little patient selectivity, no radiation, and good repeatability, it has been used to construct models of the left atrial appendage in recent years. 10,11 Combining 3DP with ultra sound imaging, constructing the 3DPM of structured heart disease using the original data of 3D echocardiography, 12 and evaluating preoperative information may provide more accurate information for clinical applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%