2018
DOI: 10.1557/jmr.2018.233
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D-printed β-TCP bone tissue engineering scaffolds: Effects of chemistry on in vivo biological properties in a rabbit tibia model

Abstract: In this study the effects of 3D printed SiO2 and ZnO doped tricalcium phosphate (TCP) scaffolds with interconnected pores were evaluated on the in vivo bone formation and healing properties of a rabbit tibial defect model. Pure and doped TCP scaffolds were fabricated by a ceramic powder-based 3D printing technique and implanted into critical sized rabbit tibial defects for up to 4 months. In vivo bone regeneration was evaluated using chronological radiological examination, histological evaluations, SEM microgr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(52 reference statements)
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This technology is further subdivided into fused deposition modeling, powder-based printing (3DP), stereolithography (SLA), selective laser sintering, and robocasting 132. In general, inkjets and microextrusion are used for the 3D printing of scaffolds, whereas extrusion-based 3D printing is used for bone 133,134Figure 5The 3D printing of a scaffold and its surface functionalization with active biological molecules to increase scaffold bioactivity: BCP conjugated with protein immobilized on a PCL 3D printed scaffold. Abbreviations: AAL, L-Alanine; BCP, biphasic calcium phosphate; Hep, heparin; IM, immobilized; MES, 2-( N -morpholino)ethanesulfonic acid; PCL, poly ( ∂>+ -caprolactone).…”
Section: Tissue Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This technology is further subdivided into fused deposition modeling, powder-based printing (3DP), stereolithography (SLA), selective laser sintering, and robocasting 132. In general, inkjets and microextrusion are used for the 3D printing of scaffolds, whereas extrusion-based 3D printing is used for bone 133,134Figure 5The 3D printing of a scaffold and its surface functionalization with active biological molecules to increase scaffold bioactivity: BCP conjugated with protein immobilized on a PCL 3D printed scaffold. Abbreviations: AAL, L-Alanine; BCP, biphasic calcium phosphate; Hep, heparin; IM, immobilized; MES, 2-( N -morpholino)ethanesulfonic acid; PCL, poly ( ∂>+ -caprolactone).…”
Section: Tissue Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3D‐printed bone implants have been the subject of many studies over the past 2 decades (Diao et al, 2018; Donate et al, 2019; Ishack, Mediero, Wilder, Ricci, & Cronstein, 2017; Komlev et al, 2015; Nandi, Fielding, Banerjee, Bandyopadhyay, & Bose, 2018; Tarafder, Davies, Bandyopadhyay, & Bose, 2013; Wen et al, 2017; Zhang, Yang, Johnson, & Jia, 2019), and many of these have investigated 3D printed TCP implants often with good results in vivo . The advantage of the method used to generate such implants in the present study is that the fatty acid‐based 3D printing method is ideal for delivering large TCP implants under time pressure as the inks are easily and rapidly formulated and can be stored prior to use.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, pore diameters of 100 µm to 1000 µm enhance blood flow, bone ingrowth, and mechanical stability of the substrate [79]. Scaffolds with similar porous properties can be generated that are made of β-TCP-ion doped matrices [80], Polyacrolactone/β-TCP scaffold [81]. Other factors that influence porosity include material chemistry, fabrication, temperature, and chemical bonds formed between the constituent materials making up the scaffold.…”
Section: Scaffold Transformation For Regenerative Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%