2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jiec.2019.06.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D-printed PCL/bioglass (BGS-7) composite scaffolds with high toughness and cell-responses for bone tissue regeneration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Formulations containing a higher percentage of BG-Mg than 50% were not considered because of the deriving limitations in the procedures both for the fabrication of a homogeneously dispersed bulk composite material and its processing through the extrusion technology, given the increased material viscosity and risk of clogging phenomena. Moreover, previous literature evidence [ 34 ] suggests that higher loading percentages (60% or higher) can lead to a decrease in the scaffold’s mechanical properties (i.e., toughness) because of the brittle behaviour of pure BG. On the other side, concentrations of BG particles that are not too low are to be preferred in order to improve the biological performance of the scaffold and to promote osteogenesis compared to composites with a small BG content (20% or less) [ 34 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Formulations containing a higher percentage of BG-Mg than 50% were not considered because of the deriving limitations in the procedures both for the fabrication of a homogeneously dispersed bulk composite material and its processing through the extrusion technology, given the increased material viscosity and risk of clogging phenomena. Moreover, previous literature evidence [ 34 ] suggests that higher loading percentages (60% or higher) can lead to a decrease in the scaffold’s mechanical properties (i.e., toughness) because of the brittle behaviour of pure BG. On the other side, concentrations of BG particles that are not too low are to be preferred in order to improve the biological performance of the scaffold and to promote osteogenesis compared to composites with a small BG content (20% or less) [ 34 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, previous literature evidence [ 34 ] suggests that higher loading percentages (60% or higher) can lead to a decrease in the scaffold’s mechanical properties (i.e., toughness) because of the brittle behaviour of pure BG. On the other side, concentrations of BG particles that are not too low are to be preferred in order to improve the biological performance of the scaffold and to promote osteogenesis compared to composites with a small BG content (20% or less) [ 34 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Alaboodi et al designed polycarbonate scaffolds with circular pore structure and studied their mechanical properties [ 15 ]. Kim et al studied the cellular response of bioglass composite scaffolds with rod structure [ 16 ]. L.Olivares et al proposed Gyroid and hexagonal scaffolds, and provides a computational approach to determine the mechanical stimuli at the cellular level when cells are cultured in a bioreactor and to relate mechanical stimuli with cell differentiation [ 17 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of methods have been used to control the porosity of a scaffold. The combination of the freeze-drying and leaching template techniques 29 , supercritical CO 2 foaming and melt processing, robocasting 30 , 31 , immersion-precipitation, freeze casting 32 , salt leaching, laser sintering, electrospinning method and direct Melt ElectroWriting (MEW) technique 33 . However, most techniques have some drawbacks: They need special equipment, are often very expensive, involve organic/inorganic porogens, templates or complicated chemical process or technology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%