3D printed patient individualised models versus cadaveric models in an undergraduate oral and maxillofacial surgery curriculum: Comparison of students' perceptions

Seifert, Lukas Benedikt; Schnurr, Benedikt; Herrera-Vizcaíno, Carlos; Begić, Amira; Thieringer, Florian M.; Schwarz, Frank; Sader, Robert

doi:10.1111/eje.12550

Cited by 11 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In the domain of dental surgery, most of the 3D models had been prepared for extraction of the retained wisdom tooth in the mandible 29‐31 . Additionally, Werz et al had designed a jaw model for the external maxillary sinus lift 29 .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Additionally, Werz et al had designed a jaw model for the external maxillary sinus lift 29 . Sefert et al and Hanish et al had designed 3D models of the mandible for the dissection of a free mucosal graft and the resection of a root tip 28,31 . The Chae et al jaw model was used for extraction of an additional tooth 27‐31 .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…There were 659 (89.54%) student participants, and 77 (10.46%) dentists involved in those studies. Five studies were pursued in prosthetics [22][23][24][25][26] and surgery, [27][28][29][30][31] two in endodontics, 32,33 one each in paediatric dentistry 34 and trauma management. 35 The 3D models were also used in a study focused on enhancing the students' overall manual dexterity, whilst making use of the PhantHome tool 36 (Table 2).…”

Section: Re Sultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Dental area-dental traumatology M. In ten studies, 3D models were developed based on the Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) of the patients, [22][23][24][25][27][28][29]32,33,35 two scans from Computed Tomography (CT) 31,34 and two images from an intraoral scanner. 26,27 One of them failed to attribute the actual source of the model's prototype.…”

Section: Höhne Et Al (2020)mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Application of 3D‐printed teeth models in teaching dentistry students: A scoping review

Dobroś¹,

Hajto‐Bryk

Zarzecka

2022

Eur J Dental Education

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Three-dimensional (3D) printing consists in making 3D objects based on the digital data. The first one of those was made in 1983 by Charles Hull, with the aid of the sterolitography technique. 1 In the 1990s, 3D printers came into use in medicine, including dentistry. 1,2 It has been over the last few years that making use of the 3D printers has grown in significance. 3 Advances in the 3D printing technology facilitate making of the anatomical models, with a view to specifically aiding the planning of surgical procedures, developing surgical guidelines, organ models or individual dentures. [3][4][5][6] The systematic review carried out by Tack et al. indicates that 3D printers are mostly applied in orthopaedics and maxillo-facial surgery, less frequently in spinal, dental or vascular surgery 3

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Re Sultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Höhne Et Al (2020)mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Application of 3D‐printed teeth models in teaching dentistry students: A scoping review

Dobroś¹,

Hajto‐Bryk

Zarzecka

2022

Eur J Dental Education

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…It is easily torn after several flap surgeries. Similar problems were experienced by Seifert et al 21 Moreover, the hardness of the material used for simulating teeth and mandible is not comparable to the haptic feedback of an actual clinical operation. Thus, it is necessary to identify better materials to simulate the actual clinical conditions.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 71%

Three‐dimensional printed model of impacted third molar for surgical extraction training

Feng

Duan

et al. 2021

Journal of Dental Education

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives: Extraction of impacted mandibular third molars is one of the most common surgical procedures performed at dental clinics; however effective training models for teaching oral surgery to dental students are limited. This study aimed to use three-dimension (3D) printing technology to develop an effective training model for impacted third molar extraction. Methods: The data for the 3D model were digitally processed using highresolution computed tomography, and two common, but different patterns of impacted third molars were simulated using computer-aided design. Thereafter, the model was printed using the 3D-printing technology, and the efficiency of the 3D-printed model and an animal model (pig mandible) were compared using a five-point Likert scale by 35 oral surgeons in the oral surgery department and 208 students of stomatology in the internship stage. Results:The 3D-printed model consisted of three parts: a non-replaceable part (i.e., the body of the mandible and the teeth from the left first molar to the right first molar) and two replaceable parts (i.e., the part of the ascending ramus of the mandible, as well as the second and third molars). It was covered with a layer of rubber-like material to simulate the gingiva. For the comparison between the 3D-printed and animal models, a total of 205 questionnaires were collected. Both oral surgeons and students agreed that the 3D-printed model was better than the animal model in terms of total value and the anatomy of the bone and teeth, simulating the surgical procedure (p < 0.05), while the two models achieved similar results for haptic feedback of the soft tissue (p > 0.05). Conclusions:The 3D-printed model is realistic and effective for learning impacted third molar extraction and received positive feedback from students and oral surgeons. This model can significantly improve the pre-clinical skill training of dental students.

show abstract

A survey regarding the organizational aspects and quality systems of in-house 3D printing in oral and maxillofacial surgery in Germany

Zeller

Goetze

Thiem

et al. 2022

Oral Maxillofac Surg

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

3D printed patient individualised models versus cadaveric models in an undergraduate oral and maxillofacial surgery curriculum: Comparison of students' perceptions

Cited by 11 publications

References 3 publications

Application of 3D‐printed teeth models in teaching dentistry students: A scoping review

Application of 3D‐printed teeth models in teaching dentistry students: A scoping review

Three‐dimensional printed model of impacted third molar for surgical extraction training

A survey regarding the organizational aspects and quality systems of in-house 3D printing in oral and maxillofacial surgery in Germany

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About