2015
DOI: 10.1039/c5lc00685f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D printed microfluidics for biological applications

Abstract: The term "Lab-on-a-Chip," is synonymous with describing microfluidic devices with biomedical applications. Even though microfluidics have been developing rapidly over the past decade, the uptake rate in biological research has been slow. This could be due to the tedious process of fabricating a chip and the absence of a "killer application" that would outperform existing traditional methods. In recent years, three dimensional (3D) printing has been drawing much interest from the research community. It has the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
434
0
5

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 610 publications
(463 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
1
434
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The advent of soft lithography was a groundbreaking enabling technology Open-source, community-driven microfluidics with Metafluidics p e r s p e c t i v e for microfluidics 20 , but photolithography requirements-from clean rooms to technology for silicon processing-still present a substantial obstacle for both developers and users. Increasingly, commodity digital fabrication technologies like three-dimensional (3D) printing 21 are being used to manufacture molds for soft lithography 22 and milli-and microfluidic systems 23,24 , including programmable valves 25 and devices for synthetic biology applications 26 . Crucially, 3D printing eliminates the photolithographic step and obviates the need for expensive silicon-processing infrastructure.…”
Section: P E R S P E C T I V Ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advent of soft lithography was a groundbreaking enabling technology Open-source, community-driven microfluidics with Metafluidics p e r s p e c t i v e for microfluidics 20 , but photolithography requirements-from clean rooms to technology for silicon processing-still present a substantial obstacle for both developers and users. Increasingly, commodity digital fabrication technologies like three-dimensional (3D) printing 21 are being used to manufacture molds for soft lithography 22 and milli-and microfluidic systems 23,24 , including programmable valves 25 and devices for synthetic biology applications 26 . Crucially, 3D printing eliminates the photolithographic step and obviates the need for expensive silicon-processing infrastructure.…”
Section: P E R S P E C T I V Ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 While 3D printing has been previously demonstrated as a viable means for the production of bespoke wearable-scale products, 5 this technology has not previously been used to print a wearable with an inner fluidic network. Until recently, additive manufacturing has been utilized to produce microfluidic devices, 6 but only in a single material and/or typically at a small scale-usually below feature sizes of 10 cm-when compared to the scale of a typical wearable. Mushtari is the first of its kind fluidic device with channels as thin as 1 mm in diameter.…”
Section: Visionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These devices are designed to temporarily or permanently replace damaged tissues or organs in the living body. The third category is in vitro biomedical platform such as microfluidic systems for molecular diagnostics and functional cell assays [16][17][18][19][20][21] . Currently, much effort in biomedical 3D printing has been devoted to creating desired 3D architecture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%