of numerous components; labor-intensive and costly tasks which often require highly trained personnel and precision alignment equipment.Breaking this cost barrier calls for a cost-effective and scalable manufacturing solution. In contrast to traditional manufacturing processes, additive manufacturing (AM), also referred to as 3D printing, produces complex volumetric structures by the successive addition of building layers. [3] The evolution of AM has seen a rapid growth in satisfying the everincreasing demands in producing geometrically complex parts and assemblies in a wide range of industries, including automobile, [4] aerospace, [5] biomedical, [6] and architecture. [7] This has the potential to transform existing optical manufacturing processes by allowing for design customization directly from digital models without sacrificing manufacturing speed and cost. Its inherent geometric complexity advantages enable a part-count-reduction (PCR) design for producing a single monolithic part to replace existing multicomponent assemblies, reducing lifecycle cost, improving performance, and eliminating further alignment. [8] AM has made great strides over the years to miniaturize optical components. Two-photon direct laser writing with sub-100 nm voxel resolution has demonstrated the fabrication of microlenses and lens assemblies, but at a rather slow "pointby-point" patterning nature. [9] Inkjet printing benefits from the viscosity and surface tension of larger liquid resin droplets to more quickly 3D print optically smooth surfaces on a solid substrate. [10] However, additional molding steps are required for freestanding optical elements. [11] A significant step in tackling this speed/accuracy trade-off was reported by us and other groups by using projection micro-stereolithography (PµSL) and its derivatives. [12] PµSL parallelizes the 3D printing process by curing an entire fabrication layer in a single exposure, being capable of printing millimeter-sized aspherical lenses in 1 h. [12c] Microcontinuous liquid interface production (µCLIP) reported further fabrication speed improvements by eliminating the lengthy resin-recoating step between the printing layers, [13] further reducing fabrication time to minutes. [12a,d] Apart from photopolymer optics, direct ink writing and computed axial lithography have been used to fabricate gradient index and free form optics from silica-based materials, although they require a sintering process utilizing high temperature over 1000 °C. [14] In addition to 3D-printed optical components, filament deposition 3D printers have been used to fabricate the optomechanics This decade has witnessed the tremendous progress in miniaturizing optical imaging systems. Despite the advancements in 3D printing optical lenses at increasingly smaller dimensions, challenges remain in precisely manufacturing the dimensionally compatible optomechanical components and assembling them into a functional imaging system. To tackle this issue, the use of 3D printing to enable digitalized optomechanical...