Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2020.108077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D printed continuous CF/PA6 composites: Effect of microscopic voids on mechanical performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

14
97
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 175 publications
(129 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
14
97
2
Order By: Relevance
“…When the layer thickness is small, the number of layers required to complete the part increases; hence, the production time will also increase. Several experiments have observed many void formations within the extruded filament, which were smaller than 16.4 μm, and they greatly affected the porosity percentage in the printed part [ 196 , 197 ]. All above-mentioned voids act as a failure initiation point when a load is applied to these samples.…”
Section: Common Defects In Fdm Printed Polymers and Fibre-reinforcmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When the layer thickness is small, the number of layers required to complete the part increases; hence, the production time will also increase. Several experiments have observed many void formations within the extruded filament, which were smaller than 16.4 μm, and they greatly affected the porosity percentage in the printed part [ 196 , 197 ]. All above-mentioned voids act as a failure initiation point when a load is applied to these samples.…”
Section: Common Defects In Fdm Printed Polymers and Fibre-reinforcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He et al [ 197 ] identified a large distribution of voids near the crack initiation point and recorded poor resistance to crack growth within those void areas. These micro voids are one of the main reasons for the poor strength exhibited by parts printed with the FDM process.…”
Section: Common Defects In Fdm Printed Polymers and Fibre-reinforcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a reference, flexural properties of unidirectional fiber-reinforced composites fabricated by the proposed method were compared with additively manufactured fiber-reinforced composites by other methods, including short carbon-fiber (SCF) composites printed by SLS, 35 FDM, 36 and continuous carbon-fiber (CCF) composites fabricated by FDM, 12,[14][15][16]19,20,[37][38][39][40] ultrasonic-assisted auto-fiber placement (UAFP), 32 and laser-assisted laminated object manufacturing (LA-LOM). 21 As shown in Figure 3B, the proposed method exhibits the highest flexural modulus and strength for all reported AM methods.…”
Section: Flexural Strength and Flexural Modulusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 3 shows a summary of the average tensile strength, modulus, and SD of the AM CFRTPCs. Figure 4B shows the tensile property map of this work compared with fiber composites fabricated by FDM, 11,12,15,16,20,[36][37][38][39]41,42 extrusion, 43 SLS, 35,43 SLA, [43][44][45] and LA-LOM. 21 The HPP unidirectional CFRTPCs prepared by the proposed method exhibited impressive tensile strength and stiffness, which are 80% and 27% higher than the strongest FDM printed CFRTPCs, respectively.…”
Section: Flexural Strength and Flexural Modulusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AM technology has been adopted by a very wide range of fields such as aerospace, automobile, manufacturing, designing, tissue, and biomedical engineering industries [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 ]. Fused deposition modelling (FDM) is one of the most widely used AM technologies owing to its operational flexibility and low cost [ 7 ]. FDM creates three-dimensional objects by laying up successive layers of thermoplastic material upon one another.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%