The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.04.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D-printed biodegradable gyroid scaffolds for tissue engineering applications

Abstract: Fused deposition modeling (FDM), a low cost and easy-to-use additive manufacturing technique, was pushed to its typical resolution limit to produce poly(lactic acid) (PLA) gyroid scaffolds. A gyroid morphology was selected as scaffold structure due to its spring shape architecture, high porosity, leading to good nutrient and waste diffusion, and favorable mechanical properties, such as isotropic resistance to pressure. Printing parameters were optimized and the need of a support material to improve printing qu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
48
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(66 reference statements)
2
48
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Gyroid was selected because of its mesh structure suitable for robust 3D printed scaffolds in tissue engineering applications. [ 70 ] The printed gyroid structure at 8 wt% SMCS loading is found to be comparable with that of commercial PMA resin (0 wt% SMCS) in terms of the details and the quality of the design (Figure 8a,b). Likewise, the dimensional accuracy was then evaluated by 3D reconstruction and surface measurement of a 3D‐printed bolt with 8 wt% SMCS loading (Figure 8c,d).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Gyroid was selected because of its mesh structure suitable for robust 3D printed scaffolds in tissue engineering applications. [ 70 ] The printed gyroid structure at 8 wt% SMCS loading is found to be comparable with that of commercial PMA resin (0 wt% SMCS) in terms of the details and the quality of the design (Figure 8a,b). Likewise, the dimensional accuracy was then evaluated by 3D reconstruction and surface measurement of a 3D‐printed bolt with 8 wt% SMCS loading (Figure 8c,d).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…In order to further understand the mechanical behavior of the printed samples, it was essential to determine their porosity and pore distribution. In recent years, X-ray μ-CT has proven to be a useful tool for medical diagnoses and nondestructive ultrasonic detection of 3D printed samples [29]. The orthogonally printed flexural specimens before and after bending tests were scanned via X-ray μ-CT. From the results, we can see that the porosity of the two orthogonally printed CF/PEEK composites were larger than that of PEEK.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4] Among the available 3D printing technologies, fused deposition modeling (FDM) is the most commonly used and cost-effective. [5,6] However, the printing materials suitable for FDM are generally limited to thermoplastics. The printing anisotropy and printing orientation in FDM process attracted great interest.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%