2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2009.09.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D phase-field simulations of interfacial dynamics in Newtonian and viscoelastic fluids

Abstract: -This work presents a three-dimensional finite-element algorithm, based on the phase-field model, for computing interfacial flows of Newtonian and complex fluids. A 3D adaptive meshing scheme produces fine grid covering the interface and coarse mesh in the bulk. It is key to accurate resolution of the interface at manageable computational costs.The coupled Navier-Stokes and Cahn-Hilliard equations, plus the constitutive equation for non-Newtonian fluids, are solved using second-order implicit time stepping. Wi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
71
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
(89 reference statements)
2
71
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When CH is used to represent an interface that does not intersect a solid wall, as is the case for drop deformation, the sharp-interface limit is well established. [7][8][9] In such a limit, achieved at finite interfacial thickness ⑀, the results no longer depend on ⑀, and the diffusion across the interface becomes negligible. The results thus become comparable with sharp-interface computations and experiments, in which the interface is exceedingly thin, down to molecular scale.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When CH is used to represent an interface that does not intersect a solid wall, as is the case for drop deformation, the sharp-interface limit is well established. [7][8][9] In such a limit, achieved at finite interfacial thickness ⑀, the results no longer depend on ⑀, and the diffusion across the interface becomes negligible. The results thus become comparable with sharp-interface computations and experiments, in which the interface is exceedingly thin, down to molecular scale.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To capture the interfacial profile and hence the interfacial tension accurately, the grid size needs to be at least as small as ⑀. 8,9 Thus, to simulate displacement in the 2 mm diameter capillary of Fermigier and Jenffer, 11 one must cover five or six decades of length scales, which is beyond the current computational capacity. This is analogous to the requirement in sharp-interface computations of resolving the slip length.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With a velocity vector involved, Equation 1 can be rewritten into the complete form of the Cahn-Hilliard equation (23)(24)(25)(26)(27) as…”
Section: Coupling With Navier-stokes Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With a few exceptions discussed by Zhou et al (2010), the mesh resolution necessary to mitigate the aforementioned limitations has led to the use of 2D planar or axisymmetric geometries in the majority of reported literature. Nonetheless, many engineering problems involve complex 3D geometries and multi-phase flow where 2D and 3D dynamics differ significantly (viscous encapsulation, spray formation, multi-phase micro-fluidic contactors).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, many engineering problems involve complex 3D geometries and multi-phase flow where 2D and 3D dynamics differ significantly (viscous encapsulation, spray formation, multi-phase micro-fluidic contactors). The inherent ability of the DI method to regularize singular events such as breakup, coalescence and moving contact lines has led to several attempts at 3D implementation within a framework that is practical both in complexity and computational cost (Badalassi et al, 2003;Jacqmin, 2004;Zhou et al, 2010). Each of these implementations has attempted to either minimize the number of cells across the interface using high-order and spectral discretization, or minimize the total mesh size through adaptive mesh refinement in the vicinity of the interface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%