Abstract:Because of the diversity of stellar masses and orbital sizes of binary systems and the complex interaction between star–star, star–planet, and planet–planet, it has been difficult to fully characterize the planetary systems associated with binary systems. Here, we report high-precision astrometric observations of the low-mass binary system GJ 896AB, revealing the presence of a Jupiter-like planetary companion (GJ 896Ab). The planetary companion is associated to the main star GJ 896A, with an estimated mass of … Show more
“…With only one previous discovery (Curiel et al 2022), astrometry is not yet a well-developed technique for the detection of exoplanets. The method comes with its own set of unique challenges.…”
In this paper, we report on the follow-up of six potential exoplanets detected with Gaia astrometry and provide an overview of what is currently known about the nature of the entire Gaia astrometric exoplanet candidate sample, 72 systems in total. We discuss the primary false-positive scenario for astrometric planet detections: binary systems with alike components that produce small photocenter motions, mimicking exoplanets. These false positives can be identified as double-lined binaries (SB2) through analysis of high-resolution spectra. Doing so we find that three systems, Gaia DR3 1916454200349735680, Gaia DR3 2052469973468984192, and Gaia DR3 5122670101678217728, are indeed near-equal-mass double-star systems rather than exoplanetary systems. The spectra of the other two analyzed systems, HD 40503 and HIP 66074, are consistent with the exoplanet scenario in that no second set of lines can be found in the time series of publicly available high-resolution spectra. However, their Gaia astrometric solutions imply radial-velocity semiamplitudes ∼3 (HD 40503) and ∼15 (HIP 66074) larger than what was observed with ground-based spectrographs. The Gaia astrometry orbital solutions and ground-based radial-velocity measurements exhibit inconsistencies in six out of a total of 12 exoplanet candidate systems where such data are available, primarily due to substantial differences between observed ground-based radial-velocity semiamplitudes and those implied by the Gaia orbits. We investigated various hypotheses as to why this might be the case, and although we found no clear perpetrator, we note that a mismatch in orbital inclination offers the most straightforward explanation.
“…With only one previous discovery (Curiel et al 2022), astrometry is not yet a well-developed technique for the detection of exoplanets. The method comes with its own set of unique challenges.…”
In this paper, we report on the follow-up of six potential exoplanets detected with Gaia astrometry and provide an overview of what is currently known about the nature of the entire Gaia astrometric exoplanet candidate sample, 72 systems in total. We discuss the primary false-positive scenario for astrometric planet detections: binary systems with alike components that produce small photocenter motions, mimicking exoplanets. These false positives can be identified as double-lined binaries (SB2) through analysis of high-resolution spectra. Doing so we find that three systems, Gaia DR3 1916454200349735680, Gaia DR3 2052469973468984192, and Gaia DR3 5122670101678217728, are indeed near-equal-mass double-star systems rather than exoplanetary systems. The spectra of the other two analyzed systems, HD 40503 and HIP 66074, are consistent with the exoplanet scenario in that no second set of lines can be found in the time series of publicly available high-resolution spectra. However, their Gaia astrometric solutions imply radial-velocity semiamplitudes ∼3 (HD 40503) and ∼15 (HIP 66074) larger than what was observed with ground-based spectrographs. The Gaia astrometry orbital solutions and ground-based radial-velocity measurements exhibit inconsistencies in six out of a total of 12 exoplanet candidate systems where such data are available, primarily due to substantial differences between observed ground-based radial-velocity semiamplitudes and those implied by the Gaia orbits. We investigated various hypotheses as to why this might be the case, and although we found no clear perpetrator, we note that a mismatch in orbital inclination offers the most straightforward explanation.
“…We reduced the data with the Astronomical Imaging Processing System (AIPS; Greisen 2003), following standard procedures for phase-referencing observations (Torres et al 2007;Ortiz-Leon et al 2017) as described in Curiel et al (2020) and Curiel et al (2022). First, corrections for the ionosphere dispersive delays were applied.…”
Section: Observations and Data Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We followed the same fitting procedure presented by Curiel et al (2022). In short, we used three astrometric fitting methods: the asexual genetic algorithm (AGA; Cantó et al 2009;Curiel et al 2011Curiel et al , 2019Curiel et al , 2020, a nonlinear least-squares algorithm, and Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC; Curiel et al 2022).…”
Section: Fitting Of the Astrometric Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, close binary systems can be used to calibrate evolutionary models due to the measurable dynamical masses and coevolution of their components, which eliminates age as a confusion factor (Zhang et al 2020). Only a few close binaries with lowmass components have been studied in detail with multiepoch very long baseline interferometry (VLBI) observations, giving high-precision mass estimates (e.g., Dupuy et al 2016;Ortiz-Leon et al 2017;Zhang et al 2020;Curiel et al 2022). Observations of nearby UCDs also offer the possibility of finding Jupiter-like planetary companions because the astrometric signature of such planets (the reflex motion of the the star due to the gravitational pull of the companion) exceed the astrometric precision that can be achieved with the Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA; of the order of, or even better than, 100 μas).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…VLBA observations can isolate the emission to individual components of the binary, and trace their absolute motion in the sky with extremely high precision. Curiel et al (2022) previously employed such a method to obtain absolute astrometry, and subsequently constrain the orbits and individual masses of the M dwarf binary system GJ896AB, whose secondary component was also found to be radio emitting. Furthermore, a Jovian-like planet was found orbiting the main star of this binary system.…”
LP 349−25 is a well-studied close stellar binary system comprised of two late M dwarf stars, where both stars are close to the limit between star and brown dwarf. This system was previously identified as a source of gigahertz radio emission. We observed LP 349−25AB over 11 epochs in 2020–2022, detecting both components in this nearby binary system using the Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA). We fit simultaneously the VLBA absolute astrometric positions together with existing relative astrometric observations derived from optical/infrared observations with a set of algorithms that use nonlinear least-squares, genetic algorithm, and Markov Chain Monte Carlo methods to determine the orbital parameters of the two components. We find the masses of the primary and secondary components to be 0.08188 ± 0.00061 M
⊙ and 0.06411 ± 0.00049 M
⊙, respectively, representing one of the most precise mass estimates of any ultracool dwarf (UCD) to date. The primary is a UCD of 85.71 ± 0.64 M
Jup, while the secondary has a mass consistent with being a brown dwarf of 67.11 ± 0.51 M
Jup. This is one of the very few direct detections of a brown dwarf with VLBA observations. We also find a distance to the binary system of 14.122 ± 0.057 pc. Using stellar evolutionary models, we find the model-derived stellar parameters of both stars. In particular, we obtain a model-derived age of 262 Myr for the system, which indicates that LP 349−25AB is composed of two pre–main-sequence stars. In addition, we find that the secondary star is significantly less evolved than the primary star.
The next generation of very long baseline interferometry (VLBI) is stepping into the era of microarcsecond ($\mu$as) astronomy, and pushing astronomy, especially astrometry, to new heights. VLBI with the Square Kilometre Array (SKA), SKA-VLBI, will increase current sensitivity by an order of magnitude, and reach astrometric precision routinely below 10 $\mu$as, even challenging 1 $\mu$as. This advancement allows precise parallax and proper motion measurements of various celestial objects. Such improvements can be used to study objects (including isolated objects, and binary or multiple systems) in different stellar stages (such as star formation, main-sequence stars, asymptotic giant branch stars, pulsars, black holes, white dwarfs, etc.), unveil the structure and evolution of complex systems (such as the Milky Way), benchmark the international celestial reference frame, and reveal cosmic expansion. Furthermore, the theory of general relativity can also be tested with SKA-VLBI using precise measurements of light deflection under the gravitational fields of different solar system objects and the perihelion precession of solar system objects.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.