All Days 2008
DOI: 10.2118/117803-ms
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D OBC Seismic Survey Parameters Optimization for a Carbonate Field Offshore Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates

Abstract: There is no doubt that 3D seismic data make a powerful contribution to field development. Less obvious, and often controversial, is the critical step of defining level of seismic survey effort required to achieve the objectives for field development. An over-specified seismic survey could be costly, and an under-specified seismic survey would not achieve the objectives. A 3D OBC pilot seismic survey was conducted in a carbonate field of offshore Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates with the main objectives: (1) to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is not always easy to image the reflectors, especially in the Upper Jurassic succession, due to the very low acoustic impedance contrast. Ishiyama et al (2008) discussed 3D OBC seismic survey parameters for a specific survey in the region, based on the results of a feasibility study and a pilot survey, which can effectively and efficiently meet our geophysical requirements: (a) orthogonal geometry with receiver point and source point intervals of 25 m, receiver line and source line intervals of 200 m, wide azimuth sampling, nominal fold of 240 in the natural bin size (12.5×12.5 m) at the maximum inline offset of 3200 m corresponding to the nominal fold of 300 in the natural bin size at the maximum inline offset of 4000 m, namely OR2B in the Ishiyama's table; or (b) areal geometry with parallel swath shooting with receiver point interval of 25 m, shot point interval of 50 m, receiver line interval of 400 m, source line interval of 50 m, wide azimuth sampling, nominal fold of 480 in the natural bin size (12.5×25 m) at the maximum inline offset of 3200 m corresponding to the nominal fold of 600 in the natural bin size at the maximum inline offset of 4000 m, namely SW4A in the Ishiyama's table.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is not always easy to image the reflectors, especially in the Upper Jurassic succession, due to the very low acoustic impedance contrast. Ishiyama et al (2008) discussed 3D OBC seismic survey parameters for a specific survey in the region, based on the results of a feasibility study and a pilot survey, which can effectively and efficiently meet our geophysical requirements: (a) orthogonal geometry with receiver point and source point intervals of 25 m, receiver line and source line intervals of 200 m, wide azimuth sampling, nominal fold of 240 in the natural bin size (12.5×12.5 m) at the maximum inline offset of 3200 m corresponding to the nominal fold of 300 in the natural bin size at the maximum inline offset of 4000 m, namely OR2B in the Ishiyama's table; or (b) areal geometry with parallel swath shooting with receiver point interval of 25 m, shot point interval of 50 m, receiver line interval of 400 m, source line interval of 50 m, wide azimuth sampling, nominal fold of 480 in the natural bin size (12.5×25 m) at the maximum inline offset of 3200 m corresponding to the nominal fold of 600 in the natural bin size at the maximum inline offset of 4000 m, namely SW4A in the Ishiyama's table.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%