70th EAGE Conference and Exhibition Incorporating SPE EUROPEC 2008 2008
DOI: 10.3997/2214-4609.20147754
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D Multiple Attenuation and Depth Imaging of Ocean Bottom Seismic Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The demultiple approach of Amundsen (2001) is a powerful processing step that can jointly suppress the effect of any type and order of free-surface multiples on both source-and receiver-side, apply source signature deconvolution (removing any residual phase in data), and deblend simultaneoussource data. Most implementations approximate multi-dimensional deconvolution of the up-going component with the down-going component by applying a deterministic trace-by-trace deconvolution in tau-p (or f-k) domain by assuming the geology to be horizontally layered (Mispel et al, 2007;Traub et al, 2009). We have instead shown that equation 1 can be successfully solved by direct matrix inversion thus accounting for the three-dimensional nature of the seismic wavefield and lateral heterogeneities in the shallow surface.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The demultiple approach of Amundsen (2001) is a powerful processing step that can jointly suppress the effect of any type and order of free-surface multiples on both source-and receiver-side, apply source signature deconvolution (removing any residual phase in data), and deblend simultaneoussource data. Most implementations approximate multi-dimensional deconvolution of the up-going component with the down-going component by applying a deterministic trace-by-trace deconvolution in tau-p (or f-k) domain by assuming the geology to be horizontally layered (Mispel et al, 2007;Traub et al, 2009). We have instead shown that equation 1 can be successfully solved by direct matrix inversion thus accounting for the three-dimensional nature of the seismic wavefield and lateral heterogeneities in the shallow surface.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%