2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-11726-9_28
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D MRI Brain Tumor Segmentation Using Autoencoder Regularization

Abstract: Automated segmentation of brain tumors from 3D magnetic resonance images (MRIs) is necessary for the diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment planning of the disease. Manual delineation practices require anatomical knowledge, are expensive, time consuming and can be inaccurate due to human error. Here, we describe a semantic segmentation network for tumor subregion segmentation from 3D MRIs based on encoder-decoder architecture. Due to a limited training dataset size, a variational auto-encoder branch is added to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
517
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 786 publications
(588 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
4
517
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, it improves the segmentation quality around the edges, which leads to overall better segmentation performance. Figure 2 illustrates how the addition of the EG-CNN to a standalone Seg-Net [16] improves the quality of segmentation. The quality of the predicted edges also validates the effectiveness of our proposed edgeaware loss function, since the boundaries are crisp and avoid the thickening effect around edges.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it improves the segmentation quality around the edges, which leads to overall better segmentation performance. Figure 2 illustrates how the addition of the EG-CNN to a standalone Seg-Net [16] improves the quality of segmentation. The quality of the predicted edges also validates the effectiveness of our proposed edgeaware loss function, since the boundaries are crisp and avoid the thickening effect around edges.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, we added volume and surface area features of each tumor component (Feng, Tustison et al 2018) and age. We performed feature selection based on SelectKBest features using the sklearn package (Pedregosa, Varoquaux et al 2011, Buitinck, Louppe et al 2013) which resulted in a reduced set of 25 features. We trained an XGBoost (XGB) model (Chen and Guestrin 2016) to classify the subjects into low (less than 300 days), medium (between 300 to 450 days) and long survivors (greater than 450 days).…”
Section: Ensemble Methodsologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Havaei et al developed a multiresolution cascaded CNN architecture with two pathways, each of which takes different 2D patch sizes with four MR sequences as channels (Havaei, Davy et al 2017). The BRATS 2018 top performer developed a 3D decoder encoder style CNN architecture with inter-level skip connections to segment the tumor (Myronenko 2018). In addition to the decoder part, a Variation Autoencoder (VAE) was included to add reconstruction loss to the model.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, automated and robust methods for providing a segmentation of the cardiac anatomy around the left ventricle (LV) are needed to support the analysis of myocardial infarction. Modern semantic segmentation methods utilizing deep learning have significantly improved the performance in various medical imaging applications [3,4,5,6]. At the same time, deep learning methods typically require large amounts of annotated data in order to train sufficiently robust and accurate models depending on the difficulty of the task.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%